2017 (1) TMI 1730

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t, 1985. During the period in question, Respondent have availed cenvat credit on various input services, on basis of documents / challans issued by their Regional Marketing Office (RMO) and Head Office registered as an Input service Distributor. 3. On scrutiny of ER-1 returns filed by the Respondent for the relevant period, the Department entertained a view that the input services in question viz. Air Travel Agent, Maintenance and Repair, Mandap Keeper, Rent a cab, Telephone services received by the respondent, do not qualify as input services, defined under Rule 2 (l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004, because the subject services were used by the Respondent for the purpose other than manufacturing and marketing to the place of removal as t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... respondent submitted that the issue of Cenvat Credit of all the subject services has already been settled in favour of the respondent by several decisions of the Tribunal. In particular she relied upon the decision in the following case laws which are in respect of their own sister units and in their own case wherein Cenvat Credit on subject services has been allowed: i) CCE Vs. Jaypee Bela Plant vide Final Order No. A/337- 340/2010-SM(BR) dated 10.04.2012 ii) CCE Vs. Jaypee Bela Cement Plant vide Final Order No. A/1549-1553/2012-SM(BR) dated 12.11.2012. iii) CCE Vs. Jaypee Rewa Cement Plant vide Final Order No. A/53251-53252/2014-SM(BR) dated 13.08.2014. 8. The dispute pertains to disallowance of Cenvat Credit on various services i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cab 1. CCE Bangalore III vs. Stanzen Toyotetsu India (P) Ltd. 2011 (23) STR 444 2. CCE Bang vs. V.T. G. Kirloskar Automotive (P) Ltd. 2011 (32) STT 251 3. CCE Chandigarh vs. M/s. Federal Mogul Goetze (India) Ltd. 2011 TIOL 650 HC P&H-ST 4. Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages (P) Ltd. vs. CCE Hyderabad 2010 (18) STR 57 (Tri-Bang) 5. CCE Vadodara vs. Haldyn Glass Gujarat Ltd. 2009 (14) STR 819 (Tri-Ahmd) 6. CCE Raipur vs. Beekay Engg. And Castings Ltd. 2009 (16) STR 709 7. Dr. Reddy's Lab Lte. Vs. CCE 2010 (19) STR 71 (Tri-Bang) 8. Semco Electrical Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE [2010 (18) STR 177 (Tri-Mum)] Inasmuch as disputed services stand covered by various decisions of the Tribunal as detailed above, I find no reason to interfere in the impugned....