Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (10) TMI 986

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ee is aggrieved by the decision of Ld CIT(A) in confirming the demand raised by the AO u/s 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act,1961 ['the Act' for short]. 2. The assessee company is earlier known as 'Ozone media solutions Private Limited'. It is engaged in the business relating to online advertising like internet based content, communications, online ad space, online ad network and renders advertising technology solutions. The department noticed that the assessee has been making payments to its US subsidiary named M/s Adadyn Inc, which were in the nature of selling and marketing expenses. The AO took the view that the impugned payments are in the nature of "Fee for technical services" and hence the assessee should have deduc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....red between the assessee and M/s Adadyn Inc., USA. He concluded that the US entity is providing marketing and business support services to the assessee in India by utilising its skill and marketing capability in the local overseas market. Since the assessee has utilised the services for its business carried on in India, he held that the impugned payments are attracted by the provisions of sec.9(1)(vii)of the Act. He also held that the assessee is liable to deduct TDS both under the Act and DTAA as the payments are in the nature of Fee for Technical Services. The AO noticed that the assessee has not furnished Tax residency certificate and hence he held that the provisions of sec.206AA shall apply. Accordingly he adopted higher rate of 20%....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ceived by the Adadyn Inc (US entity) are composite in nature (being royalty as well as consultancy services and may be others also). Since it is taxable under the IT Act as well as DTAA the TDS must have been deducted. 63. On the issue of rate applicable I hold that the rate prescribed under DTAA or Act whichever beneficial to the appellant is applicable." 8. Aggrieved by the order passed by Ld CIT(A), the assessee has filed these appeals. 9. The Ld A.R submitted that the assessee is engaged in the business of online advertisements. Since its customers are located in USA, Canada and other countries, it has floated a subsidiary in USA by name M/s Adadyn Inc. The assessee has utilised the above said company in order to provide ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....le 12 of India USA DTAA. Without analysing the same, the Ld CIT(A) has expressed the view that the services are made available. He submitted that the tax authorities have not demonstrated as to how the services rendered by M/s Adadyn Inc fall in the category of technical services and how it was made available to the assessee. The Ld CIT(A) has also expressed the view that a part of payment has been made for other services also. He contended that the payments made by the assessee do not fall under the category of royalty or fee for technical services either under sec. 9(1) of the Act or under DTAA. Accordingly he submitted that the order passed by Ld CIT(A) is liable to quashed. 11. On the contrary, the Ld D.R submitted that the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f that the assessee has been using market analysis/ online data/data bases etc., belonging to M/s Adadyn Inc. The above said observation of Ld CIT(A) was strongly objected to by the assessee. Hence the observation of the Ld CIT(A) that a part of payment constitutes Royalty is strongly disputed. Further, we also notice that the Ld CIT(A) has also not properly analysed the provisions of article 12 of India USA DTAA. Without analysing the nature of services, the Ld CIT(A) has observed that the services were made available. Thus, we notice that the Ld CIT(A) has rendered the decision without bringing on record supporting materials and also without properly analysing the provisions and contentions of the assessee. In the absence of proper ana....