Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (10) TMI 648

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ministrative costs and other relevant expenses as prior period expenses by holding that in order to claim the expenditure as deduction, it is necessary to declare income under the provisions of Chapter XIV-C of the Act. 3. The brief facts of the case are that the AO noticed that assessee has not declared any income from business operations, whereas it has claimed other expenditure and loss at Rs. 65,86,224. As expenditure was claimed without declaring any income and claiming loss, the claim was not allowed by the AO within the meaning of section 28 while computing income u/s. 29 of the Act. Therefore the entire amount of expenditure of Rs. 65,86,244 to the extent of loss claimed was disallowed. 4. The CIT(Appeals) observed that the expend....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) Ltd [2009]-Hon. Delhi High Court- 184 TAXMAN 452 5      Saurashtra Cement & Chemical Industries Ltd. [1973R-ion. Gujarat High Court- 91 ITR 170 6 Dhoomketu Builders & Development (P.) Ltd. [2013]-Hon. Delhi Court-34 taxmann.com 18 7 UE Development India (P.) Ltd. [2013]-Hon. Bangalore ITAT- 35taxmann.com 607 6. We have heard the parties and perused the record. In our opinion, there is merit in the plea of assessee. The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT v. Dhoomketu Builders & Development (P) Ltd., 34 taxmann.com 18 (Delhi) has held that having regard to the business of the assessee, which is the development of real estates, the participation in the tender represents commencement of one activity which would ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that till the land is acquired, the business is not set-up. The difficulty in accepting the argument is that an assessee may not be successful in acquiring land for long period of time though he is ready to commence his business in real estate, and that would result in the expenses incurred by him throughout that period not being computed as a loss under the head 'Business' on the ground that he is yet to set-up his business. That would be an unacceptable position. The other argument of the revenue that the tax auditors of the assessee have themselves pointed out that the assessee is yet to commence its business is also relevant because of the distinction between the commencement of the business and setting-up of the same. 7. As s....