TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2016 (7) TMI 1589
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....-<br>Income Tax<br>MR. KS JHAVERI AND MR. G.R.UDHWANI, JJ. FOR THE APPELLANT : MR SUDHIR M MEHTA, ADVOCATE FOR THE OPPONENT : MRS SWATI SOPARKAR, ADVOCATE COMMON ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI) 1. By way of these Appeals, the Appellant - Department has challenged the judgment and order dated 11.09.2009 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, "A" Bench at Ahmedabad. 2. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... on the observations made in paragraphs 18 and 19 of the decision, which reads as under :- "18. In this case, it is not the case of the appellant that any incriminating material in respect of the assessment year under consideration was found during the course of search. At the relevant time when the notice came to be issued under section 153A of the Act, the assessee filed its return of income. M....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sallowances can be made only on the basis of the incriminating material found during the search or requisition. In the present case, it is an admitted position that no incriminating material was found during the course of search, however, it is on the basis of some material collected by the Assessing Officer much subsequent to the search, that the impugned additions came to be made. 19. On behalf....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sment year in exercise of powers under section 153A of the Act and the earlier assessment shall have to be reiterated. In this regard, this court is in complete agreement with the view adopted by the Rajasthan High Court in the case of Jai Steel (India), Jodhpur v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (supra). Besides, as rightly pointed out by the learned counsel for the respondent, the controver....