2020 (10) TMI 215

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Mr. Rajesh Mahna with Mr. Ramanand Roy, Mrs. Sonia Shama and Mr. Mayank Kouts, Advocates. Respondents Through: Mr. Satyakam, ASC for Govt. of NCT of Delhi. JUDGMENT C.M.No.24798/2020 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) No.7411/2020 1. The petition has been listed before this Bench by the Registry in view of the urgency ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... respondent no.2 to grant permission to revise the aforesaid returns but the said request was rejected. 5. He submits that action of the respondent no.2 of not allowing revision of details of requirement of form 'F', is perverse in law as it is contrary to the provisions of the DVAT Act and Central Sales Tax (Delhi) Rules which permit issuance of forms. 6. He relies upon the judgment of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on Ltd. v. Commissioner, VAT decided on 11th April, 2017, which have been appealed against in the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court has stayed the operation of the judgment of this Court. 8. Mr. Satyakam points out that in the light of the interim orders passed by the Supreme Court, while deciding another writ petition i.e. Ingram Micro India Ltd. v. Commissioner, Department of Trade and Taxes ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tment of Trade and Taxes & Ors., W.P. (C) No. 3024/2019 decided on 15th January, 2020. 10. Mr. Satyakam contends that this Court has recently in similar matters been either adjourning matters or is allowing the petition but suspending the relief till the civil appeals pending in the Supreme Court are decided. 11. Having heard the counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that no useful ....