2020 (9) TMI 1130

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pplicant : Shri Addl. CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru. For the Respondent : Shri Priyadarshi Mishra, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru ORDER PER N.V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT This miscellaneous petition u/s. 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [the Act] is filed by the assessee praying for rectification of certain apparent errors in the order of Tribunal dated 08.02.2016 in ITA No.1068/Bang/2016. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cause the law is well settled that same income cannot be taxed twice. The burden will however be on the Assessee to show as to how the income offered in a later assessment year was income which was not recognised in earlier Assessment year by reason of application of AS-9. Subject to these observations, we find no merit in this appeal by the Assessee and dismiss the same." 3. In this miscellane....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t the words "either in this year or" should be added to line 6 of para 14 of the order of Tribunal, after the words "how the income offered" so that the 6th line of para 14 reads as under:- "how the income offered either in this year or in a later assessment year was income which was" We hold and order accordingly. 6. We are of the view that the absence of insertion of the aforesaid....