2020 (9) TMI 1059
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....NOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Brisketu Sharan Pandey, Advocate Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Lalit Kishore ( AG ) ORDER ( Per : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ) Petitioner has prayed for the following relief (s) : "a. For issuing writ/writs, order/orders quashing the Demand Order (Summary of Order) dated 29.06.2020 issued in FO....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ll the pendency of the proceedings. e. For directing the Respondents not to take any coercive action against the petitioner untile the pendency of the proceedings. f. For holding the proceedings under Section 74 of the CGST Act cannot be initiated without serving a proper notice which complied with Section 74(1) of the CGST Act. g. For holding that any general show cause....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... l. To pass any other order/orders which it may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case and within the ends of equity, justice and good conscience." Shri Pawan Kumar, learned counsel for the State states that there were prior proceedings which led to the issuance of impugned demand notice dated 29.06.2020 (Annexure-P/2). If that be so, we are not inclined to examine the s....


TaxTMI