1990 (4) TMI 305
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 1. These are appeals by special leave challenging the reversing common decision of the Punjab & Haryana High Court holding the insurer liable for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act of 1939. 2. The insurer repudiated its liability by maintaining that the policy had been taken after the accident and, therefore, it had no liability to meet the award of compensation against the owner. The Tr....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Division Bench decision of the Allahabad High Court in Jaddoo Singh and Anr. v. Smt. Malti Devi and Anr. asupports this view on principle. 4. There is evidence in this case that the vehicle was insured earlier upto 31.8.1984 and the same was available to be renewed but instead of obtaining renewal, a fresh insurance was taken from 28th of September, 1984, which is the date of the accident. We are....




TaxTMI
TaxTMI