Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (9) TMI 934

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... ( Per Sri Justice M.S.Ramachandra Rao) In this Writ Petition, the petitioner assails the Assessment Order A.O No.24643/CST/36870157564/15-16 dt.11.03.2020 passed by the 1st respondent, which was served on the petitioner on 29.07.2020. 2. The petitioner was issued a show-cause notice by the 1st respondent on 07.06.2019 proposing to assess the petitioner under Central Sales Tax Act,1957 for the f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....job work transactions supported by F-Forms for a total value of Rs. 2,91,45,741/-. It also submitted another objection on 10.03.2020 objecting to the proposed gross taxable turnover of Rs. 10,45,78,271/- and enclosed certain F-Forms which related to inter-State transfer of job work material. It also submitted certain job work challans issued under Central Excise Act and contended that the movement....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....etitioner before the 1st respondent, there is no reference in the impugned order at all. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that non- consideration of these material i.e., F-Forms in the impugned order by the 1st respondent vitiates the order. He also contended that the assessment proceedings made by the 1st respondent for the period April, 2015 to February, 2016 are barred by limita....