Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1990 (5) TMI 32

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....writ petition is to the validity of section 80HHB of the Income-tax Act as being violative of articles 14 and 19(1) of the Constitution. The case was listed for hearing along with Income-tax References Nos. 110 to 112 of 1987 (Continental Construction Ltd. v. CIT [1990] 185 ITR 178 (Delhi)), wherein the question which arose was whether the petitioner was entitled to the benefits of section 80-0 o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the provisions of section 80HHB(3). According to the petitioner, the conditions prescribed under section 80HHB(3) were not complied with because till the introduction of section 80HHB in the Income-tax Act, the petitioner was getting the benefit of section 80-0 in terms of such types of agreements. The petitioner, therefore, did not create reserve accounts as contemplated by section 80HHB(3) thou....