2020 (9) TMI 690

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y the assessee emanates from the order of the Ld. CIT(Appeals)-1, Nashik dated 05.04.2017 for the assessment year 2009-10 as per following grounds of appeal on record: "1. On the basis of facts and the circumstances of the case and as per law, the Commissioner of Income Tax, (Appeal)-1, Nashik, is not justified in confirming the levy of penalty of Rs. 10,000/- U/s. 271(1)(b) of the Act. 2. The....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..../s 142(1) of the Act on 30.09.2014 requiring the assessee to furnish certain informations. The Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act and a show cause notice issued along with the notice u/s 142(1) of the Act. That there was no response to the show cause notice issued and the Assessing Officer imposed the penalty of Rs. 10,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act in the han....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Officer had issued another notice u/s. 142(1) of the Act. Again there was non-compliance and the Assessing Officer proceeded to impose penalty u/s. 271(1)(b) of the Act stating that there was no reasonable cause demonstrated by the assessee for non-attendance on the given date as per the said notice. The penalty was confirmed by the ld. CIT(A) upholding the findings of Assessing Officer. When we ....