Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (9) TMI 685

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Deepak Anand and Ms. Purvi Sinha, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr. Chetan Sharma, ASG with Mr.Anil Soni, CGSC & Mr. Devesh Dubey, Advocate for R-1/UOI. Mr. Ravi Prakash, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Sahaj Garg, Mr. R.V. Prabhat and Mr. Amit Gupta for R-3/NAPA. Ms. Sonu Bhatnagar, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Vaibhav Joshi, Ms. Anushree Narain and Ms. Venus Mehrotra, Advocates for resp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Parent Act, that in absence of proper provisions of law as also rules, the entire proceedings initiated thereunder are unconstitutional, unlawful, without jurisdiction and bad in law and that "Procedure and Methodology" issued under Rule 126 by the respondent no. 3-NAPA is void, ineffective and unconstitutional. Petitioner challenges notices dated 02nd March, 2020, 16th March, 2020, 15th May, 202....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s and undertakes that post introduction of CGST and SGST, the petitioner has passed on the benefit of reduction of input tax credit to all its flat buyers in all other projects in the State of Haryana. He also emailed an undertaking dated 08th September, 2020 filed by the petitioner. The same is reproduced hereinbelow:- "1. That the petitioner has filed writ petition under Article 226/227....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y pray for and are permitted to file counter-affidavits within a period of four weeks. Rejoinder, if any, be filed before the next date of hearing. In view of the aforesaid facts, no ground for stay of payment is made out in the present case. Respondent no.3 is directed to verify the claims made by the petitioner with respect to passing on the commensurate benefit amounting to Rs. 35,28,744/-. ....