2020 (9) TMI 648
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... J.B.PARDIWALA AND HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA Mr Nirzar S Desai for the Petitioner Mr.Shamik Bhatt, Ld.Adv with Ms.Aneri Acharya, Ld.Adv for Singhi & Co for the Respondent ORDER PER: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA 1. These four applications have been preferred by the Commissioner of Service Tax, Ahmedabad with a request to take up the Tax Appeals for final hearing ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....esent application has been preferred by the appellant - original appellant for the following reliefs: "A. pending the admission, hearing, and final disposal of the captioned Tax Appeal, the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to stay the implementation, operation and execution of the Order in Original No.STC/4-41/O&A/07 dated 29.12.2008 passed by the respondent - Commissioner of Service Tax, Ahm....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d by the Commissioner, Service Tax, Ahmedabad, dated 29.12.2008 - Order in Original, confirmed by the CESTAT, during the pendency and final disposal of Tax Appeal on condition that the applicant/ appellant shall deposit 25% of the demand with interest as on today with the Department, to be deposited within a period of four weeks from today. It goes without saying that the aforesaid shall ....


TaxTMI