Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2020 (9) TMI 502

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt was earlier clearing this product classifying it under Central Excise Tariff heading 1511 9090 and claiming the benefit of exemption notification No.03/2006- CE dt.01.03.2006 (S.No.9) (as amended). The appellant had filed the ER-1 returns accordingly. CBEC had also issued Circular No.81/2002-CUS dt.03.12.2002 regarding classification of the product. It was clarified that fractions of palm oil having the presence of triglycerides of fatty acids would merit classification under Chapter 15 and products which are free from fatty acids would be classifiable under Chapter 38. As the appellant's product did not contain triglycerides they classified their product under CTH 1511. Thereafter w.e.f. 28.02.2005 a specific entry has been made for Pal....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vered the period of September, 2008 to March, 2012, the annexure to the show cause notice would show that clearance were only up to September, 2010 and not beyond. Therefore, the entire demand has been raised in the show cause notice invoking extended period of limitation. Interest was also demanded and an equivalent amount of penalty has been imposed under section 11AC. Penalty was also imposed under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. 5. After hearing both sides and perusing the records, we find that on merits, the issue has been settled by the Hon'ble Apex Court in October, 2010 and it has been held that Palm Stearin is classifiable under Central Excise Tariff Heading 3823 and not under CTH 1511. Thus, it has been decided against ass....