1929 (4) TMI 4

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd very briefly are these. There is a joint Hindu family of which Lala Kalyanmal seems to be the head. He was called upon by the Income Tax Officer to furnish a return of the income by a notice which was served on Lala Kalyanmal on 13th April 1928. The notice was under Section 22(2) of the Act and called upon the proposed assessee to make his return of income by 12th May 1928. It will be noticed h....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ering from consumption and that he himself was suffering from a toothache. His application was disallowed and on 2nd June 1928, an assessment to the best of the judgment was made by the Income Tax Officer under provisions of Section 23(4) of the Act. 3. Lala Kalyanmal thereupon made an application to the Income Tax Officer to give him a fresh opportunity to file his return. His application was ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....use for the purpose of Section 27 or adequate reason for granting further extension of time. 4. As regards this point, the Commissioner was of opinion that it was a question of fact and not a question of law. Having, however, said so much, the learned Commissioner formulated the following question for determination by this Court: Was the assessee prevented by sufficient cause from maki....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....arises in the case. 6. Having, however, said so much, we have found that there is a very substantial question of law raised in the statement of the case. 7. We have already held, in another case, that it is open to the High Court to formulate questions of law that really arise in a case and to answer them for the benefit of the Commissioner and the parties. The substantial question of law th....