Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (8) TMI 1979

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....leging difference between value as per the Profit & Loss A/c. and the value as declared in ST-3 Returns in respect of claim of payment of outward freight, loading/unloading, rail freight, clearing and forwarding and the amount paid by the Transporters in respect of which service tax is paid by the Transporters. 2. The Adjudicating Authority confirmed the demand of service tax of Rs. 9,30,480/- along with interest and imposed equal amount of penalty under Section 78 and penalty of Rs. 5,000/- under Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. On appeal, the Learned Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the adjudication order and rejected the appeal filed before him. Hence, the present appeal before the Tribunal. 3. The Ld. Sr. Advocate appearing on behalf....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 3,09,066   Railway Freight 52,61,566   Railway Rake Handling 29,89,859   Loading /Unloading charges 34,29,164   Service Tax collected by C&F 1,49,85,759 2,69,75,414   Total 14,37,640 Now details submitted 22.11.2016     Railway Rake Handling 10,95,100   Service Tax collected by C&F 3,40,961 14,36,061 Difference Total 1,579 As regards the loading and unloading charges incurred by the appellant for the period 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 amounting to Rs. 7,92,407/- and Rs. 34,29,164/- respectively, it is submitted that the service provider had collected the service tax in the invoice raised which was paid by the appellant. Accordingly, service tax cannot be demanded ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ar 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 as shown in the Profit & Loss A/c. of the appellant company have not been properly declared in ST-3 Returns filed by them. Regarding loading/unloading charges it is submitted that the same have been paid to the labourers for loading of materials into the Lorries and for unloading from the Lorries and since these amounts are paid to the labourers by vouchers, no service tax liability arose on this amount. Regarding service tax on freight charges it is submitted that service tax was paid by the Transporter and also claimed by them in their bills. Regarding service tax liability on railway freight it is claimed that the same is exempted from service tax vide Notification No. 36/2004-ST dated 31.12.2004. Rs. 3,09,066/....