Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2020 (9) TMI 259

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....anging for the India part of the shoot of the film ; 2. engaging the contributors in accordance with the provisions of Schedule 4 and making payments for and on behalf of the Producere to the Contributors and to such suppliers for the Film in India as shall be specifically authorized by the Producer, provided that any and all such payments are reported to the Producer in accordance with the Indian Production Services Budget on such basis as the Producer shall reasonably require and notify the Service Company in writing ; 3. hiring individuals other than the Contributors for the provision of their services on the Film in the UK, Poland and India ; 4. procuring for air travel of contributors travelling from India and the excess baggage ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed by the service providers are in the name of the Appellant and the corresponding payments have also been made by the Appellant. It was further submitted that the services provided by the Appellant do not qualify as 'intermediary service', as an intermediary is a person who arranges or facilitates a provision of service between two persons without any value addition. The Appellant also submitted that the Adjudicating Authority had incorrectly observed that there was a want of documentary proof in respect of the Appellant's refund claim while all relevant documents evidencing the necessary debit to the Cenvat Credit account of the Appellant had been duly submitted. The ld. AR on behalf of the Revenue reiterated the observations of the lower....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tities. However, for removal of doubt, it is pertinent that the service provided by the Appellant must at the same time also not qualify as intermediary service. 9. In this regard, I find that the aforementioned Guidance Note had clarified the meaning of 'intermediary' as under : "Para 5.9.6 what are intermediary services? Generally, an "intermediary" is a person who arranges or facilitates a supply of goods, or a provision of service, or both, between persons, without material alteration or further processing. Thus, an intermediary is involved with two supplies at any given time: * The supply between the principal and the third party; and * The supply of his own service (agency service) to his principal, for which a fee or commiss....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....], has interpreted the aforementioned clause in the Guidance Note as under: "From the above Guidance Note of CBEC dated 20th June 2012 and definition of intermediary, the following conclusionscan be drawn: (a) An intermediary arranges or facilities provision of a 'main service' between two or more persons; (b) An intermediary is involved with two supplies at any one time (i) the supply between the principal and the third party; and (ii) the supply of his own service (agency service) to his principal, for which a fee or commission is usually charged; (c) An intermediary cannot influence the nature or value of service, the supply of which he facilitates on behalf of his principal, although the principal may authorize to negotiate a di....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e to the service receiver are not intermediary services. 13. On perusal of the agreement between the Appellant and Shandaar UK Ltd., it is evident that the service provided by the Appellant was on a principal to principal basis and that the Appellant had not been appointed as an agent of Shandaar UK Ltd. 14. Further, I find that the Appellant had contended before the First Appellate Authority that the Appellant had duly submitted the Cenvat credit ledger, the statement of Cenvat credit available on the date of filing the refund application and copy of ST-3 return indicating the debit in Cenvat credit register. However, the First Appellate Authority has not considered this submission of the Appellant. 15. In respect of the services that t....