2020 (9) TMI 247
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e bench of this Court in the case of the very same assessee in the Tax Appeal No.423 of 2016 and allied Tax Appeals, this Tax Appeal should fail and is liable to be dismissed. 4. We find reference of the judgment rendered by a coordinate bench of this Court in the case of Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority, in the judgment rendered by a coordinate bench of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax v. Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation (Tax Appeal No.380 of 2017 with Tax Appeal No.381 of 2017 to Tax Appeal No.382 of 2017, decided on 28th June 2017). We quote para-16 of the said judgment thus : "16.1 In para 12.2 to 15.1 of the said decision, the Division Bench of this Court has observed and held as under :- "12.2 Whether the activities of the appellant AUDA can be said to be in the nature of trade, commerce or business as occurring in the first proviso to Section 2(15) of the Act, few decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court as well as other High Courts are required to be referred to at this stage. 12.3 In the case of Khoday Distilleries Ltd & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka & Ors., reported in (1995) 1 SCC 574, the Hon'ble Supreme Court had an occasio....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e Delhi High Court has observed and held as under: "64. It is not necessary that a person should give something for free or at a concessional rate to qualify as being established for a charitable purpose. If the object and purpose of the institution is charitable, the fact that the institution collects certain charges, does not alter the character of the institution. 67. The expressions trade, commerce andbusiness as occurring in the first proviso to section 2(15) of the Act must be read in the context of the intent and purport of section 2(15) of the Act and cannot be interpreted to mean any activity which is carried on in an organized manner. The purpose and the dominant object for which an institution carries on its activities is material to determine whether the same is business or not. The purport of the first proviso to section 2(15) of the Act is not to exclude entities which are essentially for charitable purpose but are conducting some activities for a consideration or a fee. The object of introducing the first proviso is to exclude organizations which are carrying on regular business from the scope of charitable purpose. The purpose of introducing the proviso to Secti....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Finally in ICAI(II) (supra), this court, with reference to H. Abdul Bakhi and Bros (supra) observed as under : 71. Although, it is not essential that an activity be carried on for profit motive in order to be considered as business, but existence of profit motive would be a vital indicator in determining whether an organisation is carrying on business or not. In the present case, the petitioner has submitted figures to indicate that expenditure on salaries and depreciation exceeds the surplus as generated from holding coaching classes. In addition, the petitioner institute provides study material and other academic support such as facilities of a library without any material additional costs. The Supreme Court in the case of State of Andhra Pradesh v. H. Abdul Bakhi and Bros. (supra) held as under: The expression "business" though extensively used a word of indefinite import, in taxing statutes it is used in the sense of an occupation, or profession which occupies the time, attention and labour of a person, normally with the object of making profit. To regard an activity as business there must be a course of dealings, either actually continued or contemplated to be continued wi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ho are engaged in commercial activities i.e. carrying on business, trade or commerce, in the garb of 'public utilities' to avoid tax liability as it was noticed that the object 'general public utility' was sometimes used as a mask or device to hide the true purpose, which was 'trade, commerce or business'. Thus, it is evident that introduction of proviso to Section 2(15) by virtue of the Finance Act, 2008 was directed to prevent the unholy practice of pure trade, commerce and business entities from masking their activities and portraying them in the garb of an activity with the object of a general public utility. It is not designed to hit at those institutions, which had the advancement of the objects of general public utility at their hearts and were charity institutions. The attempt was to remove the masks from the entities, which were purely trade, commerce or business entities, and to expose their true identities. In the case of M/s G.S. 1 India (Supra), in para 21, 22 and 27, the Delhi High Court has observed and held as under : "21. ... As observed above, legal terms, trade, commerce or business in Section 2(15), mean activity undertaken with a vie....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e examine the data, which should be analyzed objectively and a narrow and coloured view will be counter-productive and contrary to the language of Section 2(15) of the Act." 12.9 While upholding the constitutional validity of the proviso to Section 2(15) of the Act, the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in the case of Indian Trade Promotion Organization vs. Director of Income Tax (Exemption) in WP(C) No.1872 of 2013 decided on 22.01.2015 has observed in para 58 as under: "As defined in Section 2(15) cannot be construed literally and in absolute terms. It has to take colour and be considered in the context of Section 10(23C)(iv) of the said Act. It is also clear that if the literal interpretation is given to the proviso to Section 2(15) of the said Act, then the proviso would be at risk of running fowl of the principle of equality enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution India. In order to save the Constitutional validity of the proviso, the same would have to be read down and interpreted in the context of Section 10(23C)(iv) because, in our view, the context requires such an interpretation. The correct interpretation of the proviso to Section 2(15) of the said Act wou....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....de, commerce or business and/or profiteering and therefore, proviso to Section 2(15) of the Act shall not be applicable. 13.2 Similar, view has been expressed by the Rajasthan High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Jodhpur vs. Jodhpur Development Authority, Jodhpur Tax Appeal No. 63 of 2012 decided on 5.7.2016. 14. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and more particularly, considering the fact that the assessee is a statutory body Urban Development Authority constituted under the provisions of the Act, constituted to carry out the object and purpose of Town Planning Act and collects regulatory fees for the object of the Acts; no services are rendered to any particular trade, commerce or business; whatever the income is earned / received by the assessee even while selling the plots (to the extent of 15% of the total area covered under the Town Planning Scheme) is required to be used only for the purpose to carry out the object and purpose of Town Planning Act and to meet with expenditure while providing general utility service to the public such as electricity, road, drainage, water etc. and even the entire control is with State Government and even....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....l public utility. If the conditions provided under the proviso are satisfied, any entity, even if involved in advancement of any other object of general public utility by virtue to proviso, would be excluded from the definition of charitable trust. However, for the application of the proviso, what is necessary is that the entity should be involved in carrying on activities in the nature of trade, commerce or business, or any activity of rendering services in relation to any trade, commerce or business, for a cess or fee or any other consideration. In such a situation, the nature, use or application, or retention of income from such activities would not be relevant. Under the circumstances, the important elements of application of proviso are that the entity should be involved in carrying on the activities of any trade, commerce or business or any activities of rendering service in relation to any trade, commerce or business, for a cess or fee or any other consideration. Such statutory amendment was explained by the Finance Ministers speech in the Parliament. Relevant portion of which reads as under : "I once again assure the House that genuine charitable organizations will not ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ection 2 (15) owing to the principle of mutuality. However, if such organizations have dealings with non members, their claim to be chargeable organizations would now be governed by the additional conditions stipulated in the proviso to section 2 (15). 3.2 In the final analysis, however, whether the assessee has for its object the advancement of any other object of general public utility is a question of fact. If such assessee is engaged in any activity in the nature of trade, commerce or business or renders any service in relation to trade, commerce or business, it would not be entitled to claim that its object is charitable purpose. In such a case, the object of general public utility will be only a mask or a device to hide the true purpose which is trade, commerce or business or the rendering of any service in relation to trade, commerce or business. Each case would, therefore, be decided on its own facts and no generalization is possible. Assessees, who claim that their object is charitable purpose within the meaning of section 2(15), would be well advised to eschew any activity which is in the nature of trade, commerce or business or the rendering of any service in relat....