Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (9) TMI 195

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....SH, A.M.: This appeal filed by the revenue is directed against the order of CIT(A) - 9, dated 31/01/2018, Hyderabad for AY 2015-16. 2. Brief facts are that the assessee is a Partnership Firm engaged in real estate business. For the year 2015-16 assessee filed its return of income admitting income of Rs. Nil after claiming deduction u/s 80IB(10) of the IT Act, 1961 of Rs. 3,64,90,555/-. In the sc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....evenue is in appeal before the Tribunal by raising the following grounds of appeal: 1. The learned C!T(A) has erred both in law and on facts of the case. 2. The learned C!T(A) should have appreciated the fact that the date of first approval i.e., 07-05-2001 should be taken as the date of approval of local authority and because it is prior to 01-04-2004, the construction should have been comple....