Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2020 (9) TMI 183

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s erred in assuming jurisdiction under section 263 and holding that the order passed by the learned Assessing Officer dated 25.11.2016 is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue." 3. At the outset, it is noted that there is a delay of 20 days in filing the appeal. The reasonable cause for the same has been attributed to be the mistake on the part of the employee who received the notice, in not communicating the same to the Consultant. Upon careful consideration and hearing the parties, we condone the delay. 4. We find that in the present case, learned PCIT has exercised his jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act') on the ground that assessee has not offered notional rent on its unsol....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....part of the property is not let during the whole or any part of the previous year, the annual value of such property or part of the property, for the period up to [one year] from the end of the financial year in which the certificate of completion of construction of the property is obtained from the competent authority, shall be taken to be nil." 8. From reading of the above, it is amply clear that the provision in the Act for BRINGING to tax the notional rent on unsold stock of house property was brought into effect from assessment year 2018-19. In the present case, the assessment year is 2014-15 and hence the said provision is not at all applicable for the current assessment year. Moreover, as referred by the learned counsel of the ass....