TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2020 (9) TMI 38
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....CHNICAL MEMBER Present:- 1. None for the Applicants. 2. None for the Respondent. ORDER 1. The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicant No. 2 (here-in-after referred to as the DGAP) vide his Report dated 29.03.2019, furnished to this Authority under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, had submitted that he had conducted an investigation on the com....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....bility for violation of the provisions of Section 171 (1) should not be fixed. After hearing the concerned parties at length this Authority vide its Order No. 41/2019 dated 26.06.2019 = 2019 (6) TMI 1265 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY had determined the profiteered amount as Rs. 5,283/- as per the provisions of Section 171 (2) of the above Act read with Rule 133 (1) of the CGST Rules, 2017....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....osed on him. 5. The Respondent vide his submissions dated 24.09.2019 has stated that the penal provisions under Section 122 of the Act read with Rule 133 (3) (d) of the CGST Rules, 2017 should not be invoked and penalty should not be imposed on him as he had accepted and paid the amount which had been determined by this Authority. He has also submitted proof of payment of the profiteered amount i....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d the provisions of Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017. 7. It is also revealed from the perusal of the CGST Act and the Rules framed under it that no penalty had been prescribed for violation of the provisions of Section 171 (1) of the above Act, therefore, the Respondent was issued show cause notice to state why penalty should not be imposed on him for violation of the above provisions as per....