Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2019 (11) TMI 1430

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he case and issue a Rule calling upon the Respondents to show cause as to why a Writ in the nature of Certiorari and/or any other writ, order or direction of like nature should not be issued quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 03.09.2019 issued/passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Taxes (Appeals), Guwahati, Assam and as to why a Writ in the nature of Mandamus and/or any other appropriate Writ, Direction and/or order should not be issued declaring section 79(5) of the Assam Value Added Tax Act, 2003, in so far as the same fails to provide discretion to the Appellate Authority for staying, reducing or waiving off pre-deposit, as unconstitutional and ultra vires and why a writ in the nature of Mandamus should not be issued dire....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the balance amount of tax, interest and penalty, till disposal of the appeal." 4. Learned counsel has fairly drawn attention of the Court towards decision rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India while dealing with Civil Appeal No.7358/2019 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.27072/2016 (M/s Technimont Private Limited -Vs- State of Punjab & Ors.) decided on 18.09.2019. We having gone through the judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in M/s Technimont Private Limited (supra) find that the following 2(two) relevant issues have been dealt with by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India:- "(b) Whether the condition of 25% pre-deposit for hearing first appeal is onerous, harsh, unreasonable and, therefore, violative o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ruing taxing statutes which are to be construed strictly. As often said, there is no equity in a tax vide CIT v. V.MR.P. Firm Muar. If the words used in a taxing statute are clear, one cannot try to find out the intention and the object of the statute. Hence the High Court fell in error in trying to go by the supposed object and intendment of the Stamp Act, and by seeking to find out the hardship which will be caused to a party by the impugned amendment of 1998. 20. In Partington v. Attorney General Lord Cairns observed as under:" 'If the person sought to be taxed comes within the letter of the law he must be taxed, however, great the hardship may appear to the judicial mind. On the other hand if the court seeking to recover the tax can....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....stoms wherein this Court observed : (Vijay Prakash case, SCC p. 406, para 9) '9. Right to appeal is neither an absolute right nor an ingredient of natural justice the principles of which must be followed in all judicial and quasijudicial adjudications. The right to appeal is a statutory right and it can be circumscribed by the conditions in the grant.' While dealing with the submission that in terms of said proviso, no relief could be granted even in cases where the requirement of pre-deposit may result in great prejudice, this Court went on to observe:- '28. We may, however, consider a hypothetical case. Supposing the correct value of a property is Rs. 10lakhs and that is the value stated in the sale deed, but the registering officer....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....isions of this Court including in P. Laxmi Devi the challenge was rejected and the thought expressed in P. Laxmi Devi was repeated in Har Devi Asnani as under:- '27. In Govt. of A.P. v. P. Laxmi Devi10 this Court, while upholding the proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 47-A of the Stamp Act introduced by Andhra Pradesh Amendment Act 8 of 1998, observed: (SCCp. 737, para 29) '29. In our opinion in this situation it is always open to a party to file a writ petition challenging the exorbitant demand made by the registering officer under the proviso to Section 47-A alleging that the determination made is arbitrary and/or based on extraneous considerations, and in that case it is always open to the High Court, if it is satisfied that the a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nable. In such circumstances, the prayer in that regard is rejected. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner has, however, contended that the financial condition of the petitioner is so weak that he would be unable to make the deposit, as required under Section 79(5) of the Act of 2003. In such circumstances, the amount be reduced or waived. It has been projected before this Court that in the judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in M/s Technimont Private Limited (supra) provides that a writ in such circumstances can be filed. 8. We have considered the contention of learned counsel. 9. The import and effect of the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India is that in case the requirement of pre-deposit is found....