Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (7) TMI 1665

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....account of license fees paid to SRK Travels & Tours Pvt. Ltd. 2. That the CIT (Appeals) has in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, has erred in law and on facts in upholding that there is a short deduction of tax by the assessee/appellant on the amount of Rs. 19,20,000/- and erred in upholding the disallowance of the same. 3. That the CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that in fact no TDS was required to be deducted on the amount paid to SRK Tours & Travels Pvt. Ltd. And as such the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) are not applicable 4. That both the lower authorities has failed to appreciate that this is a case where the disallowance is for alleged short deduction of TDS and this is not a case of non-deduction of TDS as pe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Act. The AO has failed to appreciate that the assessee could have never foreseen these additions being made against the assessee. The above objections are without prejudice to each other. The assessee craves leave to alter, amend or withdraw all or any objections herein or add any further grounds as may be considered necessary either before or during the hearing." 3. The assessee is carrying on the business of Hotels at various properties owned by different owners. The assessee filed return of income for assessment year 2012-13 declaring a total income of Rs. 4,82,98,700/- against the total tax due of Rs. 1,57,76,017/- including advance tax, TDS and self assessment tax. The Assessing Officer observed that the assessee company paid lice....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vered by the judgment of the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in the case of CIT vs. S.K. Tekriwal (supra) wherein the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court had held that in case of any shortfall due to any difference of opinion as to the taxability of any item or nature of payments falling under the various TDS provisions, the assessee can be declared to be the assessee in default u/s 201 of the Act but no disallowance can be made by invoking provisions of section 40a(ia). The Hon'ble High Court of Calcutta observed that the provisions of section 40a(ia) have two limbs; one is where, inter alia, the assessee has to deduct tax and second where after deducting tax, inter alia, the assessee has to pay the same into government account. The Hon'ble High Court....