2019 (6) TMI 1514

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sha Rani For the Respondent : No appearance JUDGEMENT [Judgement of the Court was made by T.S. Sivagnanam, J.] These tax case appeals are filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, ('the Act' for brevity) are directed against the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in I.T.A No.1806/Mds/2005 dated 15.06.2007 for the assessment year 2001- 02 and i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ve heard Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel assisted by Mrs.K.G.Usha Rani for the appellant in both the cases. 4. So far as substantial question of law No.2 is concerned, it is not disputed by the Revenue that the same is covered against the Revenue in the light of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. HCL Technologies Ltd.,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s name to be deleted. Accordingly, the Division Bench directed the name of the erstwhile counsel be deleted. Thus, the assessee is not represented by any counsel before us. 7. The assessee for the relevant assessment years namely 2001-02 and 2002-03 claimed the benefit of exemption under Section 10A of the Act for its STPI unit. The Assessing Officer while computing the assessment vide orders dat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ully gone through the order passed by CIT(A) and we find that the discussion starts from paragraph 9.1. The CIT(A) after going through the entire factual matrix, held that the assessee has furnished sufficient material to show that there is a separate and distinct STPI formed which has engaged itself in export and development of software involving substantial investment in infrastructure including....