TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2020 (8) TMI 7
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....fficer (A.O) on noticing that the assessee did not maintain any stock register and on noting defect in the method of valuation of stock adopted by the assessee, had resorted to rejection of books of accounts maintained by the assessee under section 145(3) of the Act and had thereafter proceeded to apply the Gross Profit Rate(GPR) of 18% to the turnover of the assessee for estimating the profit earned during the year .That the matter was carried in the appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) who upheld the rejection of books of account but at the same time reduced the estimation of GPR from 18% to 16%. 5. Aggrieved by the same the assessee has came up in appeal before us challenging both the act of rejection of books as well as estimation of gross profit raising the following effective grounds: 1. (a)That the Worthy Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in confirming the order of the Assessing Officer in rejecting the books of accounts as per para 3.2 of his order. (b) That the Worthy CIT(A) has erred in not considering the fact that assessee has maintained proper day to day books of accounts in the normal course of its business and same was also got audited by the Chartered Acco....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... for determining the value of the stock was an incorrect method since the assessee applied the GP rate of the year for valuation of stock. Ld. DR pointed out that the correct method of valuation of stock is at cost or market value whichever is less and the method adopted by the assessee by applying the GPR for the year to the stock found did not confirm to the accepted modes of valuation. On the contrary the Ld. DR pointed out that the method adopted was only a means for maintaining its GPR from year to year. Ld. DR therefore pleaded that the books of accounts maintained by the assessee had been rightly rejected. He further pointed out that the fact of not maintaining stock record and the incorrect method of valuation adopted by the assessee had been confirmed by the statement recorded by the partner of the assessee firm and the employees during survey conducted at the premises of the assessee in 2015 wherein they had categorically confirmed the fact of not maintaining of stock register and also the fact that the GPR for the year was applied to determine the value of stock at the year end. Ld. DR contended that though this statement were not recorded in the impugned year, but still....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....so on any other matter relevant for any proceedings under the Act. The only condition is that the statement should be voluntary and should not be obtained through coercion or intimidation. Still further, it has been held in the case of Hira Singh & Co. v. CIT (HP) 230 ITR 791 that addition made on the basis of such admission by assessee is justified. From the said statements recorded the AO observed that the valuation is not based on any costing but is just to maintain a certain GP ratio and is arrived at by backward calculation from the GP of the previous year. Thus the value of stock shown by the appellant in the balance-sheet is not reliable. The statement of the manager of the company was also recorded for also stated that no details of stocks such as registers are maintained and that it is difficult to ascertain the method of valuation of stock. The same applies to statements recorded during survey operations also. Moreover, the survey may have been conducted subsequently but the contents of the said statements recorded are very much relevant for the year under consideration as it has not been shown with evidence as to how the state of affairs regarding valuation of stock are ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....v. British Paints India Ltd. (SC) 88 ITR 44 that it is not only the right but the duty of the Assessing Officer to consider whether the books disclose the true state of accounts. Even if the method of accounting is regularly followed, the Assessing Officer can reject it since there is no estoppel in these matters and each year is a self contained unit. Every assessment year is independent and the Assessing Officer can rectify any error accepted in the earlier years. In income-tax proceedings, each assessment year is independent and the principle of res-judicata does not apply. The fact that the auditor in the audit report has certified that the valuation of stock is as provided by the partners shows that the method of valuation of stock adopted by the appellant is not as per the accounting standards. Merely because this fact was found during the survey operations pertaining to another assessment year, does not mean that the same has been borrowed in the year under consideration. It is equally relevant for the year under consideration. In para 28 of the audit report, the auditor has filled as 'NIL' the quantitative details of raw material and finished goods. Since the method....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ation. Rather, the AR has himself contended that the same method of accounting has been followed consistently over the years. This itself defies the stance that the statements do not hold good for the year under consideration. Further, the books of accounts have been rejected by pointing specific defects as discussed above and not merely due to the absence of stock register. Therefore, the case-laws relied upon by the AR to the effect that books of accounts cannot be rejected merely because of the absence of stock register, do not help the appellant's case, the facts being different in the instant case. Thus, in the absence of the quantitative details, the Assessing Officer was justified in not being satisfied about the fairness or correctness of the books of accounts of the appellant and the same were rightly rejected. 8. We have heard both the parties and have carefully gone through the orders of the authorities below. 9. We shall first take up the issue relating to rejection of books of accounts u/s 145(3) of the Act, whether it was as per law raised in Ground of appeal No. 1(a),(b),(c). Undeniably the power to reject books of accounts is to be exercised only when the book....