2020 (7) TMI 4
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the Respondents : Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Standing Counsel ORDER AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed challenging the action of the respondents in issuing recovery notices even though as per the petitioner it had applied under the SVLDRS Scheme. 2. As per the petitioner, during inquiry by the Anti Evasion CGST, Gurugram, on 12.01.2018 the Unit Head of the petitioner had made a ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ts application could not have been rejected because the respondents wrote a letter dated 24.09.2019 (Annexure P-10) to one of the supplier of the petitioner calling upon it to stop payment to the petitioner and the amount due may be paid directly to the credit of the Central Goods and Service Tax Department. The petitioner particularly relies upon Para No.2 of the said letter which is as follows:-....