TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2020 (1) TMI 1197
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....uance of the above mentioned attachment order and noting of the charge in revenue record of the Revenue Survey No.7,8 and 9 at village: Vadadala, Taluka & Dist. Bharuch. (C ) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, direction and/or order in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondent No.2 to treat order of attachment dated 11.2.2014 at Annexure-B to the petition as well as letter addressed to the petitioner dat5ed 1.8.2014 at Annexure-C to the petition as well as recovery proceedings initiated in pursuance of the above mentioned attachment order and noting of the charge in revenue record of the Revenue Recovery Survey Nos.7,8 and 9 at village: Vadadala, Taluka & Dist: Bharuch as null and void and of no effect. (D) Pending hearing and final disposal of the present petition, Your Lordships may be pleased to stay the operation and implementation of the order of attachment dated 11.2.2014 at Annexure-B to the petition as well as further proceedings of the letter addressed to the petitioner dated 1.8.2014 at Annexure-C to the petition in the interest of justice. (E) Your Lordships may be pleased to award ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., the respondent No.2, i.e., the Commercial Tax Officer got a charge registered of Rs. 6,24,54,735/- on the immovable property of the Company bearing Revenue Survey No.8 towards the dues under the VAT Act. It appears that the respondent No.2 issued an attachment order dated 11th February, 2014 under the provisions of Section 45 of the VAT Act, 2003. 2.7 The aforesaid action on the part of the respondent No.2, ultimately, led to the filing of the present writ application. 3. Mr. Pranav Desai, the learned counsel appearing for the writ applicant-Bank vehemently submitted that the issue raised in this writ application now stands covered by a Division Bench decision of this Court in the case of Kalupur Commercial Cooperative Bank Ltd. vs. State of Gujarat, rendered in the Special Civil Application No.17891 of 2018 decided on 23rd September, 2019. According to Mr. Desai, the Bank will have the first charge over the secured assets in accordance with the provisions of the SARFAESI Act as well as the RDB Act and the State cannot put forward any claim over such secured assets of the Bank by relying on the provision of Section 48 of the VAT Act. According to Mr. Desai, the respondent N....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s annexed herewith and marked as Annexure-R4" 8) I respectfully say and submit that the petitioners bank was informed about the dues of the respondent department and first charge of the State Government under section 48 by letter dated 29.10.2013. A copy of the letter dated 29.10.2013 is annexed herewith and marked as Annexure R5". 9) I respectfully say and submit that the respondent being a State, enjoys first charge under section 48 of the Act and its charge shall supersede any mortgage or a charge created by the petitioner bank. I rely on judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported at 2009 (4) SCC page no.94." 7. In such circumstances, referred to above, Mr. Dave prays that there being no merit in this writ application, the same be rejected. 8. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and having gone through the materials on record, the only question that falls for our consideration is whether the respondent No.2 could have issued notice for attachment of the immovable properties of the original borrower relying upon Section 48 of the Act, 2003. 9. As rightly pointed out by Mr. Desai, the aforesaid issue is no longer res integr....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ecovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993, read as under : "31B. Priority to secured creditors.- Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, the rights of secured creditors to realise secured debts due and payable to them by sale of assets over which security interest is created, shall have priority and shall be paid in priority over all other debts and Government dues including revenues, taxes, cesses and rates due to the Central Government, State Government or local authority. Explanation.- For the purposes of this section, it is hereby clarified that on or after the commencement of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (31 of 2016), in cases where insolvency or bankruptcy proceedings are pending in respect of secured assets of the borrower, priority to secured creditors in payment of debt shall be subject to the provisions of that Code." "34. Act to have over-riding effect.- (1) Save as provided under sub-section (2), the provisions of this Act shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or in any instrument having effect by virtue of an....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....) STATEMENT OF OBJECTS AND REASONS The financial sector has been one of the key drivers in India's efforts to achieve success in rapidly developing its economy. While the banking industry in India is progressively complying with the international prudential norms and accounting practices, there are certain areas in which the banking and financial sector do not have a level playing field as compared to other participants in the financial markets in the world. There is no legal provision for facilitating securitisation of financial assets of banks and financial institutions. Further, unlike international banks, the banks and financial institutions in India do not have power to take possession of securities and sell them. Our existing legal framework relating to commercial transactions has not kept pace with the changing commercial practices and financial sector reforms. This has resulted in slow pace of recovery of defaulting loans and mounting levels of nonperforming assets of banks and financial institutions. Narasimham Committee I and II and Andhyarujina Committee constituted by the Central Government for the purpose of examining banking sector reforms have conside....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....operties given for due repayment of any financial assistance given by any bank or financial institution; (h) Empowering banks and financial institutions to take possession of securities given for financial assistance and sell or lease the same or takeover management in the event of default, i.e., classification of the borrower's account as nonperforming asset in accordance with the directions given or under guidelines issued by the Reserve Bank of India from time to time; (i) The rights of a secured creditor to be exercised by one or more of its officers authorized in this behalf in accordance with the rules made by the Central Government; (j) An appeal against the action of any bank or financial institution to the concerned Debts Recovery Tribunal and a second appeal to the Appellate Debts Recovery Tribunal; (k) Setting up or causing to be set up a Central Registry by the Central Government for the purpose of registration of transactions relating to securitisation, asset reconstruction and creation of security interest; (l) Application of the proposed legislation initially to banks and financial institutions and empowerment of the C....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....h huge amount of public money in litigation prevents proper utilization and recycling of the funds for the development of the country. The Bill seeks to provide for the establishment of Tribunal and Appellate Tribunals for expeditious adjudication and recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions. Notes on clauses explain in detail the provisions of the Bill. ACT 51 OF 1993 The Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Bill having been passed by both the Houses of Parliament received the assent of the President on 27th August 1993. It came on the Statute Book as THE RECOVERY OF DEBTS DUE TO BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT, 1993 (51 of 1993):)" 15. The plain reading of Section 48 of the VAT Act indicates that it starts with a non-obstante clause 'notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any law for the time being in force. Section 48 of the VAT Act creates first charge on the property. The issue as regards the claim of priority of the secured creditor visa- vis the first charge of the property under the State Legislation was considered by the Supreme Court in the case of Central Bank of India vs. State of K....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ed under sub-section (4) merely regulates distribution of money received by the secured creditor. It does not create first charge in favour of the secured creditor. 116. The non obstante clauses contained in Section 34(1) of the DRT Act and Section 35 of the Securitisation Act give overriding effect to the provisions of those Acts only if there is anything inconsistent contained in any other law or instrument having effect by virtue of any other law. In other words, if there is no provision in the other enactments which are inconsistent with the DRT Act or Securitisation Act, the provisions contained in those Acts cannot override other legislations. Section 38C of the Bombay Act and Section 26B of the Kerala Act also contain non obstante clauses and give statutory recognition to the priority of State's charge over other debts, which was recognized by Indian High Courts even before 1950. In other words, these sections and similar provisions contained in other State legislations not only create first charge on the property of the dealer or any other person liable to pay sales tax, etc. but also give them overriding effect over other laws. 126. While enacting the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....eir dues or enforcement of security interest, as the case may be. 131. The Court could have given effect to the non obstante clauses contained in Section 34(1) of the DRT Act and Section 35 of the Securitisation Act vis a vis Section 38C of the Bombay Act and Section 26B of the Kerala Act and similar other State legislations only if there was a specific provision in the two enactments creating first charge in favour of the banks, financial institutions and other secured creditors but as the Parliament has not made any such provision in either of the enactments, the first charge created by the State legislations on the property of the dealer or any other person, liable to pay sales tax etc., cannot be destroyed by implication or inference, notwithstanding the fact that banks, etc. fall in the category of secured creditors. " 16. Indisputably, the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Central Bank of India (supra) was prior to the amendment in the Act, 2002 and 1993 respectively. However, what is important are the observations of the Supreme Court as contained in para-126 of this decision quoted above. The Supreme Court observed that while enacting the DRT Act, ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... (iii) In Union of India v. G.M. Kokil, AIR 1984 SC 1022, the Supreme Court, at Paragraph 10, held as follows: "It is well-known that a non-obstante clause is a legislative device which is usually employed to give overriding effect to certain provision over some contrary provision that may be found either in the same enactment or some other enactment, that is to say, to avoid the operation and effect of all contrary provisions." (iv) In Chandavarkar Sita Ratna Rao v. Ashalata S. Guram, [1986] 4 SCC 447, at Paragraph 67, the Supreme Court held as follows: "67. A clause beginning with the expression "notwithstanding any thing contained in this Act or in some particular provision in the Act or in some particular Act or in any law for the time being in force, or in any contract" is more often than not appended to a section in the beginning with a view to give the enacting part of the section in case of conflict an overriding effect over the provision of the Act or the contract mentioned in the nonobstante clause. It is equivalent to saying that in spite of the provision of the Act or any other Act mentioned in the non-obstante clause or any contract....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... been applied in several decisions. 104. In State Bank of West Bengal v. Union of India, [(1964) 1 SCR 371], it was observed that: "68... the Court must ascertain the intention of the legislature by directing its attention not merely to the clauses to be construed but to the entire statute; it must compare the clause with the other parts of the law and the setting in which the clause to be interpreted occurs." 105. In Madhav Rao Jivaji Rao Scindia v. Union of India and another [(1971) 1 SCC 85], Hidayatullah, C.J. observed that the non obstante clause is no doubt a very potent clause intended to exclude every consideration arising from other provisions of the same statute or other statute but "for that reason alone we must determine the scope" of that provision strictly. When the section containing the said clause does not refer to any particular provisions which it intends to override but refers to the provisions of the statute generally, it is not permissible to hold that it excludes the whole Act and stands all alone by itself. A search has, therefore, to be made with a view to determining which provision answers the description and which does not. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... equivalent to saying that inspite of the provisions or Act mentioned in the non-obstante clause, the provision following it will have its full operation or the provisions embraced in the non-obstante clause will not be an impediment for the operation of the enactment or the provision in which the non-obstante clause occurs. [See 'Principles of Statutory Interpretation', 9th Edition by Justice G.P. Singh Chapter V, Synopsis IV at pages 318 & 319] 22. When two or more laws or provisions operate in the same field and each contains a non-obstante clause stating that its provision will override those of any other provisions or law, stimulating and intricate problems of interpretation arise. In resolving such problems of interpretation, no settled principles can be applied except to refer to the object and purpose of each of the two provisions, containing a non-obstante clause. Two provisions in same Act each containing a non-obstante clause, requires a harmonious interpretation of the two seemingly conflicting provisions in the same Act. In this difficult exercise, there are involved proper consideration of giving effect to the object and purpose of two provisions and ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....would prevail over the provisions of Section 68-B of the Motor Vehicles Act for the following reasons : (1) Section 43 appears in an Act which is later than the Motor Vehicles Act and, therefore, unless there is anything repugnant, the provisions in the later Act must prevail. (2) If the object behind the two statutes is to be looked into, namely, the Act and the Motor Vehicles Act, the Act which was passed to meet an emergency arising out of the Chinese invasion of India in 1962 must prevail over the provisions contained in Chapter IV-A of the Motor Vehicles Act which were meant to meet a situation arising out of the taking over of the motor transport by a State. (3) The language of Section 43 was found to be more emphatic than the language of Section 68-B. The Supreme Court took notice of the fact that Section 43 provided that the provisions of the Act or any rule made thereunder shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any enactment other than the Act. This, according to the Supreme Court, was indicative of the intention of the legislature that the Act shall prevail over the other statutes. 26. The observa....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....h.IV-A was to prevail over Ch.IV of the Motor Vehicles Act or over any other law of the same kind dealing with motor vehicles or for compensation. On the other hand s. 43 of the Act emphatically says that the Act will prevail over any enactment other than the Act, and this suggests that the legislature intended that the emergency legislation in the Act will be paramount if there is any inconsistency between it and any other provision of any other law whatsoever. Such a provision is understandable in view of the emergency which led to the passing of the Act." 27. The principles discernible from the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Kumaon Motor Owners' Union Ltd. (supra) are that, if there is a conflict between the provisions of the two Acts and if there is nothing repugnant, the provisions in the later Act would prevail. The second principle discernible is that, while resolving the conflict, the court must look into the object behind the two statutes. To put it in other words, what necessitated the legislature to enact a particular provision, later in point of time, which may be in conflict with the provisions of the other Acts. The third principle discernib....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e context are as follows: Maharashtra Tubes Ltd. v. State Industrial & Investment Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. & Anr., [1993 ] 2 SCC 144; Sarwan Singh & Anr. v. Kasturi Lal, [1977] 2 SCR 421; Allahabad Bank v. Canara Bank & Anr., [2000] 4 SCC 406 and Shri Ram Narain v. The Simla Banking Industrial Co. Limited, [1956] SCR 603. 10. We may notice that the Special Court had in another case dealt with a similar contention. In Bhoruka Steel Ltd. v. Fairgrowth Financial Services Ltd. [1997] v. 89 Company Cases 547, it had been contended that recovery proceedings under the Special Court Act should be stayed in view of the provisions of the 1985 Act. Rejecting this contention, the Special Court had come to the conclusion that the Special Court Act being a later enactment would prevail. The head note which brings out succinctly the ratio of the said decision is as follows : "Where there are two special statutes which contain nonobstante clauses the later statute must prevail. This is because at the time of enactment of the later statute, the Legislature was aware of the earlier legislation and its non-obstante clause. If the Legislature still confers the later enactment ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ied persons in the manner set down under section 11(2) of the 1992 Act. This can only mean that the Legislature wanted the provisions of Section 11(2) of the 1992 Act to prevail over the provisions of any other law including those of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985. It is a settled rule of interpretation that if one construction leads to a conflict, whereas on another construction, two Acts can be harmoniously constructed then the latter must be adopted. If an interpretation is given that the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, is to prevail then there would be a clear conflict. However, there would be no conflict if it is held that the 1992 Act is to prevail. On such an interpretation the objects of both would be fulfilled and there would be no conflict. It is clear that the Legislature intended that public monies should be recovered first even from sick companies. Provided the sick company was in a position to first pay back the public money, there would be no difficulty in reconstruction. The Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction against considering a scheme for reconstruction has to keep in mind the fact th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he outset, clarify that the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, notified the provisions of Section 26(E) on 1st September 2016. The copy of the Notification issued by the Government of India, published in the Official Gazette Part-II, Section 3, at Serial No.2142 dated 1st September 2016 has been placed on record. The Notification reads as under : "MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Financial Services) NOTIFICATION New Delhi, the 1st September, 2016 S.O. 2831 (E).--In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 1 of the Enforcement of Security Interest and Recovery of Debts Laws and Miscellaneous Provisions (Amendment) Act, 2016 (44 of 2016), the Central Government hereby appoints the 1st day of September, 2016 as the date on which the following provisions of the said Act shall come into force, namely :- Sr. No. Sections 1 Sections 2 and 3 (both inclusive); 2 Sections 4 [except clause (xiii)]; 3 Section 5 and 6 (both inclusive); 4 Sections 8 to 16 (both inclusive); 5 Sections 22 to 31 (both inclusive); 6 Sections 33 to 44 (both inclusive). [F.No. 3/5/2016 - DRT] ANANDRAO VISHNU PATIL, Jt. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ervention of the court. This is apparent from the Statement of Objects and Reasons of the SARFAESI Act. Thus, an interpretation that, while the secured creditors will have priority in case they proceed under the RDB Act they will not have such priority if they proceed under the SARFAESI Act, will lead to an absurd situation and, in fact, would frustrate the object of the SARFAESI Act which is to enable fast recovery to the secured creditors. 36. The insertion of Section 31B of the RDB Act will give priority to the secured creditors even over the subsisting charges under other laws on the date of the implementation of the new provision, i.e. 1.9.2016. The Supreme Court, in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh v. State Bank of Indore, (2001) 126 STC 1 (SC), has held that a provision creating first charge over the property would operate over all charges that may be in force. The following observations made in para 5 of the said judgment are relevant: "5. Section 33-C creates a statutory charge that prevails over any charge that may be in existence. Therefore, the charge thereby created in favour of the State in respect of the sales tax dues of the second respondent pr....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rge on the property then secured creditors cannot have claim against the statutory provision. Therein, consideration was also made even in reference to Section 100 of the Act of 1882. It is submitted that judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Central Bank of India (supra) was prior to the amendment in the Act of 2002 and 1993 thus would not apply to the cases governed by the amended provisions. In the case in hand, the attachment of property by the State is prior to the amendment thus amended provision would not apply. Section 47 of the Act of 2003 was invoked prior to the amendment. We are yet considering the effect of the amended provision. The Apex Court has made analysis of a provision of first charge vis a vis secured creditor in the case of Central Bank of India (supra). The first charge was given supremacy than rights under mortgagee or to a secured creditor. The distinction between "first charge and secured creditor" is necessary to analyse scope of Section 26E of the Act of 2002 and Section 31B of the Act of 1993. The amended provisions are having overriding effect and give priority to the secured creditors vis a vis State dues. It does not, however, ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... respect of secured assets of the borrower, priority to secured creditors in payment of debt shall be subject to the provisions of that code." 9. Thus, the aforesaid statute makes it very clear that the dues of the bank are to be recovered at the first instance. Section 33 of the MP VAT Act, 2002 reads as under:- "33 : Tax to be first charge (1) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, contained in any law for the time being in force and subject to the provisions of section 530 of the Companies Act, 1956 (No.1 of 1956), any amount of tax and/ or penalty or interest, if any, payable by a dealer or other person under this Act shall be first charge on the property of the dealer or such person. (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, where a dealer or person is in default or is deemed to be in default under clause (a) of subsection (11) of section 24 and whose property is being sold by a bank or financial institution for recovery of its loan, the Commissioner may forgo the right of first charge as mentioned in subsection (1) against the property sold on the following conditions:- (a) if the arrears of tax, penalty, interest or part there....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....f Charge' over the Mortgaged property in question, with regard to the tax and other dues, and (ii) As to the status and the rights of a Third party Purchaser of the Mortgaged property in question." 40. Sanjay Kishan Kaul, CJ. (as His Lordship then was) observed as under : "...We are of the view that if there was at all any doubt, the same stands resolved by view of the Enforcement of Security Interest and Recovery of Debts Laws and Miscellaneous Provisions (Amendment) Act, 2016, Section 41 of the same seeking to introduce Section 31B in the Principal Act, which reads as under:- "31B. Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, the rights of secured creditors to realise secured debts due and payable to them by sale of assets over which security interest is created, shall have priority and shall be paid in priority over all other debts and Government dues including revenues, taxes, cesses and rates due to the Central Government, State Government or local authority. Explanation. - For the purposes of this section, it is hereby clarified that on or after the commencement of the Insolvency and Bankrupt....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r the time being in force, any amount of tax, penalty, interest, sum forfeited, fine or any other sum, payable by a dealer or any other person under this Act, shall be the first charge on the property of the dealer or, as the case may be, person. [(2)(2) The first charge as mentioned in sub-section (1) shall be deemed to have been created on the expiry of the period specified in sub-section (4) of section 32, for the payment of tax, penalty, interest, sum forfeited, fine or any other amount." 43. Thus, Section 37 of the MVAT Act, 2002, although starts with a non-obstance clause "notwithstanding anything contained in any contract to the contrary", yet it clarifies that the same shall be subject to any provision regarding creation of the first charge in any Central Act, any amount of tax, penalty, interest, sum forfeited or any other sum payable by a dealer or any other person under the Act shall be the first charge on the property of the dealer. Clause (2) proceeds to explain the term "first charge". The first charge is deemed to have been created on the expiry of the period specified in subsection (4) of Section 32, for the payment of tax, penalty, interest, sum f....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... cess and other rates payable to Central Government or the State Government or the Local Authority. The applicability of provisions of Section 31B of RDB Act which is pari materia to Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act was subject matter for consideration before the Full Bench of the Madras High Court in the matter of Assistant Commissioner (CT) Chennai vs. the Indian Overseas Bank decided on 11.11.2016 and the Full Bench has observed in paragraph 4 of the Judgment that "the law having now been come into force naturally it would govern the rights of the parties in respect of even lis pendence" We do not propose to analyse the Full Bench judgment delivered by the Madras High Court." 45. The Madras High Court (Madurai Bench), in the case of Indian Overseas Bank v. The Sub Registrar, Tuticorin Keelur, Tuticorin District and others, (Writ Petition No.14618 of 2018, decided on 18th December 2018), had the occasion to consider Section 31B of the RDB Act. The Division Bench of the Madras High Court observed as under : "Similar issue came up for consideration before this Court in W.P.(MD).No.10724 of 2018, dated 06.12.2018, Central Bank of India Vs the Joint Sub-Registrar No.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....held that, "The Crown's preferential right to recovery of debts, over other creditors is confined to ordinary or unsecured creditors. The Common Law of England or the principles of equity and good conscience (as applicable to India) do not accord the Crown a preferential right for recovery of its debts over a mortgagee or pledgee of goods or a secured creditor. It is only in cases where the Crown's right and that of the subject meet at one and the same time that the Crown is in general preferred. Where the right of the subject is complete and perfect before that the King commences, the rule does not apply, for there is no point of time at which the two rights are at conflict, nor can there be a question which of the two ought to prevail in a case where one, that of the subject, has prevailed already. Sec. 158(1) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act specifically provides that the claim of the State Government to any moneys recoverable under the provisions of Chapter XVI shall have precedence over any other debts, demand or claim whatsoever including in respect of mortgage. Sec. 158 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act not only gives a statutory recognition to the doctrine of Stat....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the State is set aside, it will merely revive the arrears outstanding on account of sales-tax to which further interest and penalty shall have to be added. The amended s. 15(2A) of the Karnataka Salestax Act shall apply. The State shall have a preferential right to recover its dues over the rights of the appellant bank and the property of the partners shall also be liable to be proceeded against. No useful purpose would therefore, be served by allowing the appeal which will only further complicate the controversy.-CST vs. Radhakishan AIR 1979 SC 1588 distinguished. State had preferential right to recover sales-tax dues over the rights of bank and property of the partners could also be liable to be proceeded against for the dues of the firm." 47. Thus, the dictum of law as laid by the Supreme Court in the aforesaid decision is that the State's preferential right to the recovery of debts over other creditors is confined to ordinary or unsecured creditors. The Supreme Court took the view that the Common Law of England or the principles of equity and good conscience (as applicable to India) do not accord the Crown a preferential right for the recovery of its debts over a m....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he Income Tax Act does not provide for any paramountancy of dues by way of income tax. This is why the Court in the case of Dena Bank v. Bhikhabhai Prabhudas Parekh & Co. [2005] 5 SCC 694 (para 19) held that Government dues only have priority over unsecured debts and in so holding the Court referred to a judgment in Giles v. Grover (1832) (131) English Reports 563 in which it has been held that the Crown has no precedence over a pledgee of goods. In the present case, the common law of England qua Crown debts became applicable by virtue of Article 372 of the Constitution which states that all laws in force in the territory of India immediately before the commencement of the Constitution shall continue in force until altered or repealed by a competent legislature or other competent authority. In fact, in Collector of Aurangabad v. Central Bank of India [1967] 3 SCR 855 after referring to various authorities held that the claim of the Government to priority for arrears of income tax dues stems from the English common law doctrine of priority of Crown debts and has been given judicial recognition in British India prior to 1950 and was therefore "law in force" in the territory of India ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e is any charge, the same would operate. The authority under the VAT Act passed the assessment order later in point of time. 52. The language of Section 48 of the VAT Act is plain and simple and the phrase 'any amount payable by a dealer or any other person on account of tax, interest or penalty' therein assumes significance. The amount could be said to be payable by a dealer on account of tax, interest or penalty once the same is assessed in the assessment proceedings and the amount is determined accordingly by the authority concerned. Without any assessment proceedings, the amount cannot be determined, and if the amount is yet to be determined, then prior to such determination there cannot be any application of Section 48 of the VAT Act. We may also refer to Section 47 of the VAT Act. Section 47 of the VAT Act is with respect to transfer of property by the dealer to defraud the Revenue. According to Section 47, if a dealer creates a charge over his property by way of sale, mortgage, exchange or any other mode of transfer after the tax has become due, then such transfer would be a void transfer. The reason why we are referring to Section 47 is that the phrase ther....