Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1990 (11) TMI 68

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....riginal Petition No. 4994 of 1990, a public limited company, is the appellant in this writ appeal. In the original petition, the prayer was to quash exhibit P-9 order passed in revision by the second respondent-Commissioner of Income-tax, dated November 17, 1988. The appellant is an assessee to income-tax. For the assessment year 1971-72, the appellant filed the return of income on October 15, 197....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he words "regular assessment" occurring in section 214(1) of the Income-tax Act as the initial assessment or the first assessment made by the Income-tax Officer under section 143(3) or under section 144 of the Act and held that it does not include any modified or revised order passed by the Income-tax Officer subsequently to give effect to any appellate order. It was held that, under section 214(1....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... interest for the advance tax paid during the financial year. There is a short cleavage of judicial opinion on this point. The Calcutta, Gujarat and Rajasthan High Courts, in the decisions in Chloride v. CIT [1977] 106 ITR 38 (Cal) ; General Fibre Dealers Ltd. v. ITO [1979] 116 ITR 40 (Cal) ; Bardolia Textile Mill v. ITO [1985] 151 ITR 389 (Guj) [FB] and CIT v. M. L. Sanghi [1988] 170 ITR 670 (Raj....