Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1990 (12) TMI 49

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ny in which the public are not substantially interested. It manufactures sodium sulphate. It was incorporated on August 30, 1960, and started manufacturing on January 1, 1962, on which date it took over a partnership firm known as Solar Chemicals which was carrying on the said business and was assessed thereon up to the assessment year 1962-63. The first assessment year for the assessee was 1963-64, the relevant accounting year being the calendar year 1962. Assessment was completed in the first instance but later it was reopened under section 147, since it was found that there were some fictitious loans and some unexplained share capital appearing in the balance-sheet for the said year. In response to a notice under section 148, the assesse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ction had to be strictly complied with. The assessee found it difficult to prove the genuineness of the hundi loans ; it offered them for assessment since it did not deem it desirable to contest the said issue. From this, said the Tribunal, it could not be inferred that the assessee had admitted that the said hundi loans, or for that matter even unexplained capital, represented its concealed income. Yet another ground given by the Tribunal was that the hundi loans and unexplained capital were included in the assessment under the head "Other sources" and not under the head "Business income" and, therefore, could not have been taken into consideration for determining the profit of the assessee. The last ground given by the Tribunal was that i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or exemption. Development allowances are some of the examples of artificial rules. What the Supreme Court meant was that, in applying section 104, the Income-tax Officer must have regard to the actual profit determined on commercial principles and not the assessable income determined in accordance with the provisions of the Act. This does not, however, mean that book profits alone must be looked into although book profits are certainly to be looked into being relevant material. Now, the assessee pleaded certain hundi loans but, during the reassessment proceedings, he gave up that plea and offered the said amount to be included in his income. Can it be said that the said amount does not constitute actual income ? Would it be reasonable to sa....