Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (6) TMI 334

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....696/- Iii The ld. CIT(A) erred in admitting additional evidence without offering an opportunity to the Assessing Officer for examining the same, in violation of Rule 46A of the I.T. Rues. Iv The ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 3,63,96,696/- when the assessee did not produce any evidence in respect of the building expenditure, before the Assessing Officer during the course of assessment proceedings. V The order of the CIT(A) is perverse as the CIT(A) has mentioned that the assessee has spent 85% of the gross receipts (i.e. Rs. 14,82,12,178/-) for charitable purpose, whereas no evidence was filed before the Assessing Officer to establish that it was spent for charitable purpose. - Vi Any other ground that may be taken up at the time of hearing before the Hon'ble ITAT -   Total tax effect 3,63,96,696/- 3. Facts of the case in brief are that assessee is a charitable trust registered u/sec. 12A of the Act, the objects and activities undertaken by the assessee are as under:- 7.1 Sponsorship - Education of poor and needy children: In 2014 the Trust sponsored the education and care of 3,952 children. (In School: 2....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ide care and protection for children with HIV/AIDS. 10 Homes for boys and girls, a Dispensary, Kitchen, Cafeteria and 2 School Blocks have been built. The campus has Mango trees and 8 acres of vegetable cultivation. Today 266 children (196 boys and 70 girls) live on the campus. Of these 60 children are HIV+ (Boys: 36 and Girls: 24). Butterfly Hill has a staff of 68 (On campus: 30 and Off campus: 38). 7.6 Butterfly Hill School: The school caters mainly to the children on campus but a few children from the surrounding villages also attend the school. There are 329 children (Boys: 221 and Girls: 108) in the school with a staff of 25 (Men: 11 and Women: 14) 7.7 Night Shelter: The Night Shelter for boys is run in a school building of the Vijayawada Municipal Corporation near the Benz Circle area. This provides a rof over their heads for boys who are on the streets. n opportunity for boys who have , for the welfare of the street children in Benz Circle area. Dinner and breakfast are provided. The children are counseled and repatriated of possible. 7.8 Observation Home (Home for Juvenile Delinquents), Vijayawada: On the request of the Superintendent we are offer....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the slums. The Doctor Clown group and other dentists and orthodontists from Italy visit our children for several months during the year. The Dispensaries at Daddy's Home and Butterfly Hill have two self-contained Dental clinics. 7.11 Technical and Professional Training Programme: Several of our boys and girls are sent for technical training to NTTF, Gannavaram, Boys Town, Hyderabad, Don Bosco Technical School, Guntur, St. Joseph's ITI, Gunadala, Asha Nilayam, Gollapudi, Kolping centre, Guntur and Apple Computers, Vijayawada. Several are also sent for Hair Cutting and Beautician courses and for Hotel Management. On our Daddy's Home campus we also have training for older boys and girls in Tailoring, Embroidery, Book Binding, Bag making and Footwear making. Several are also trained in Electrical work, Plumbing, Air Conditioning and Building Painting. 7.12 Slum Schools: We are working in 7 slum areas in Vijayawada: 1. Brahmarambhatiuram 2. Kandrika/ Rajiv Nagar 3. New Rajarajeswaripeta 4. Alankar Centre/Sambamurty Road 6. Autonagar 7. Vambey Colony 8. Bhaskaraopeta In....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pended towards charitable purposes. Accordingly, assessment was completed u/sec. 143(3), dated 31/03/2016. 4. On appeal, ld. CIT(A) by considering all the details directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made by the Assessing Officer. 5. On being aggrieved, the department is in appeal before this Tribunal. 6. Ground Nos. 1 & 6 are general in nature, no adjudication is required, therefore, same are dismissed. 7. Ground Nos. 2 & 3 raised by the department on the ground that ld. CIT(A) deleted the addition without giving opportunity to the Assessing Officer which is amounting to violation of rule 46A of the I.T. Rules. In the assessment order, the Assessing Officer has noted that the assessee has debited expenses on account of construction to the tune of Rs. 3,63,96,696/- during the year. During the course of hearing, on 28/03/2016 only partial bills were furnished. The assessee not filed other details such as where such activity has happened, what is the activity undertaken and whether Government permission were obtained are not were not furnished. He further observed that the assessee furnished the photographs and submitted that the construction activity ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....addition was made. The assessee is running various institutes for that purpose various buildings have been constructed for the A.Ys. 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 & 2014-15, in all the years the cost incurred by the assessee is allowed in the scrutiny assessment. The year under consideration the Assessing Officer based on the Inspector's report (who is not competent to estimate the cost of construction) disallowed the expenditure incurred by the assessee is highly improper and unjustified. This is continues activity carried by the assessee by utilizing the funds received from various people. The objects of the assessee are very clear that the assessee is running various homes for different purposes to run such huge activity various buildings are required, therefore the assessee continuously carrying the construction activity according to the objects of the society, therefore the Assessing Officer without examining the issue and without considering the details filed, simply disallowed the entire expenditure incurred by the assessee is not correct. Further, the assessee started the construction activity in earlier years i.e. A.Ys. 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 & 2014-15 all the years the ....