Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (2) TMI 1306

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....me Tax (Appeals) - 42 hereinafter referred to as the CIT erred in confirming the penalty of Rs. 3,03,756/-- imposed by the Assessing Officer under the provisions of Section 271 (1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Your Appellant submits [hat they have received interest of Rs. 491,513/- on the Income Tax refund LI'S 244A and the accountant of the Firm credited the same in the books of account to Income [ax Account and since the amount of interest was not appearing separately it was clubbed in the Income Tax Refund figure and therefore by mistake was credited to the Income Tax account and thus left out to be credited to Profit and Loss Account and thus left to be clubbed in taxable income. Further the actual Income tax re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at Rs. 43,06,401/-, as against the total income declared for Rs. 38,14,887/-. The Ld. AO has determined total income of Rs. 43,06,401/- by making additions towards income from other sources being interest received on income tax refund u/s 244A amounting to Rs. 4,91,513/-. Thereafter, penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the I.T.Act, 1961 was initiated for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. During the course of penalty proceedings, the assesee vide letter dated 14/08/2015 has filed detailed submissions and argued that it is has neither concealed particulars of income, nor furnished inaccurate particulars of income, which warrants levy of concealment penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the I.T.Act, 1961. The Ld. AO did not convince with argume....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....CIT(A) order, the assessee is in appeal before us. 5. The Ld. AR for the assesee submitted that the Ld.CIT(A) has erred in confirming penalty levied by the Ld. AO u/s 271(1)(c) of the I.T.Act, 1961,without appreciating the fact that the assessee has offered interest received of income tax refund u/s 244A of the Act, in the subsequent AY 2013-14, when the actual refund was credited to the account of the assessee. The Ld. AR, further submitted that the Ld. AO, as well as the Ld.CIT(A) were erred in coming to the conclusion that the assesse has made deliberate attempt to evade tax on interest income, ignoring the fact that interest on income tax refund was very much available with the department in Form No. 26AS and there is no possibility ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ffered interest on income tax refund amounting to Rs. 4,91,513/- for the impugned Assessment Year, because it was not having specific details with regard to interest received on income tax refund, although the refund vouchers was generated by the department. Further, refund generated for AY 2009-10 was adjusted to tax payable for AY 2007-08 and was finally refund was issued on 30/03/2012. This information was available to the assesee on 23/05/2012. Therefore, the assesse claimed that it has not considered interest income for the impugned assessment year, however fact remains that said interest income has been offered to tax for the AY 2013-14 and this fact has not been disputed by the lower authorities. But, the Ld. AO has levied penalty on....