Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1961 (8) TMI 65

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the provisions of section 31 of the U.P. Agricultural Income Tax Act. According to the petitioner, the assessment order was made on January 31, 1954. Notice of demand in respect thereof was issued on March 18, 1954, and served on the petitioner on October 9, 1954. The petitioner says that having regard to the provisions of section 30 of the Agricultural Income Tax Act, the first installment of this tax demand became payable on November 9, 1954, and the second and final installment became payable on May 9, 1956. The petitioner says that recovery notice in respect of these amounts was issued on July 12, 1956, requiring payment to be made by July 19, 1956. In support of this averment the petitioner has filed annexure "A" to his affidavit. I a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d on July 12, 1956, was beyond time. It was the issue of this notice which he characterises as the commencement of recovery proceedings. To my mind, learned counsel is not right in this submission. Under sub-section (1) the Collector is authorised to recover the amount as if it were an arrear of land revenue. The authority which sets the Collector in motion is the assessing authority under the U.P. Agricultural Income Tax Act. From annexures "III" and "IV" to the counter affidavit it is found that the assessing authority made a report to the Collector on May 12, 1954, and on October 9, 1954, that there were arrears in respect of the agricultural Income Tax due for 1360F and that steps may be taken for the realisation of the same. On May 13,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ri materia and the language used is exactly the same. In this view the proceedings for recovery were well within one year as contemplated in sub-section (2) of section 32 and recovery proceedings in this case cannot be held to be invalid as being out of time. There is one other aspect of this matter which must be adverted to. As shown above, section 32(1) of the U.P. Agricultural Income Tax Act says that agricultural Income Tax dues and penalties may be realised as if they were an arrear of land revenue. Section 288 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act lays down as follows : "The provisions of this Act with regard to the recovery of arrears of revenue shall apply to all the arrears of revenue and sums of money re....