Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (6) TMI 142

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ANCE : Shri Ankur Upadhyay, advocate for the Appellant Shri Vinod Lukose, Superintendent (AR) for the Respondent RAJU : These appeals have been filed by M/s. Man Industries against denial of Cenvat credit. 2. Learned Counsel for the appellant argued that the Cenvat credit has been denied to them in respect of service tax paid on management, maintenance and repairs and rental charges....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oth, a manufacturing unit and a service provider. In these circumstances, Cenvat credit account is common and the credit cannot be denied. 3. Learned Authorised Representative relies on the impugned order. He pointed out that in the order-in-original it has been categorically held that the goods are cleared from the factory on payment of duty and therefore, factory gate is the place of removal.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uyers as and when required by the buyers from the dumpsite. The order-in-original also asserts that the consideration received for providing this service did not form part of assessable value of the goods i.e. pipes. This assertion made in the order-in-original has not been refuted in the grounds of appeal. In Para 7(ii), it has been asserted that the appellant have recovered charges from the buye....