2019 (12) TMI 1305
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....td. Vs Principal Secretary/Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Ezhilagam, Chennai and Another, (2015) 81 VST 389 (Mad). 3.In paragraph Nos.61 & 62, learned Single Judge has summarised his views as follows:- 61. In the light of the above conclusion, the decision relied on by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the case of Binani Industries Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes VI Circle, Bangalore [2007] 6 VST 783 (SC) with regard to reopening of the assessment does not render assistance to the case of the petitioners. Accordingly Question No. 6 is answered against the petitioners. 62. In the result, (1) the challenge to the impugned circular is held to be unnecessary since the circular is a ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....invisible loss and calling upon the dealer to reverse the input tax credit availed to that extent. Consequently, all notices issued to the petitioner for reopening and all consequential order passed reversing the input tax credit to the extent of either 4% or 5% or on adhoc per centage stands set aside. However, liberty is granted to the concerned Assessing Officer to issue appropriate show cause notices to the petitioners clearly setting out under what circumstances they propose to revise or call upon the petitioner to reverse refund sanctioned and after inviting objections proceed in accordance with law. (5) The undertaking given by the dealer in Form W is with regard to information furnished for the purpose of verification by th....


TaxTMI