2018 (6) TMI 1700
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ber, This appeal by the Revenue is preferred against the order of the CIT(A)-XXV, New Delhi dated 21.10.2011 pertaining to A.Y 2008-09. 2. The solitary grievance of the Revenue is that the ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 73.85 lakhs made by the Assessing Officer on account of undisclosed income held by the Assessing Officer. 3. Briefly state....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....neja and since the assessee being a Nepali national and an employee with Taneja's has no means either to conduct a business or to pay the alleged payments. Accordingly, the Assessing Officer made the addition of Rs. 74,85,500/- in the hands of the assessee on protective basis. 4. The assessee strongly agitated the matter before the ld. CIT(A). After considering the facts and su....


TaxTMI
TaxTMI