Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (6) TMI 1700

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ber,    This appeal by the Revenue is preferred against the order of the CIT(A)-XXV, New Delhi dated 21.10.2011 pertaining to A.Y 2008-09.   2. The solitary grievance of the Revenue  is that the ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 73.85 lakhs made by the Assessing Officer on account of undisclosed income held by the Assessing Officer.   3. Briefly state....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....neja and since the assessee being a Nepali national and an employee with Taneja's has no means either to conduct a business or to pay the alleged payments.  Accordingly, the Assessing Officer made the addition of Rs. 74,85,500/- in the hands of the assessee on protective basis.   4. The assessee strongly agitated the matter before the ld. CIT(A).  After considering the facts and su....