Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2020 (4) TMI 560

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....capital gain on the sale of inherited property, the indexed cost of acquisition has to be computed with reference to the year in which the previous owner first held the asset and not the year in which the assessee became the owner of the asset." 2) "On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Learned CIT(A) erred in not adopting a 'literal interpretation' in case of tax statutes whereas the Explanation (iii) to section 48 of the Act clearly mentions that for computing the indexed cost of acquisition, the base year has to be the first year in which the asset was held by the "assessee" and not the previous owner of the asset and thus going against the decision of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ions providing for deductions under different Heads of Income are separate f4rom the respective charging sections? 7. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, Ld. CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the temporal conditions laid down in section 54(l)(ii) on transfer of the new asset when applied to that asset being situated outside India would lead to section 45 of the Act having taxing jurisdiction over income arising outside India in the case of the non-resident resulting in a contradiction vis-a-vis section 5(2) of the Act? 8. Whether on the facts and in the circumstance of the case and in law, Ld. CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating that the amendment brought in by the Finance Act, 2014 in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....7% of her share in residential house for a consideration of Rs. 26.74 crores on 09-12- 2013. The assessee while computing the indexed cost of acquisition had taken indexation benefit on fair market value from 01-04-1981 (indexation cost) as a base year. The AO further noted that the property (asset) was acquired by way of inheriting the after the death of her father and mother on 06-12-2012 and 13-06-1998, respectively. However, the assessee claimed indexation cost from 1981. The assessee was issued show cause notice by AO as to why the indexation cost should not be treated from the date of her acquisition. The AO after considering the submission of assessee, the AO treated the date of acquisition from 2012 and resultantly granted indexatio....