Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (4) TMI 555

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the cross objections are filed by the assessee in support of the order of the Ld.CIT(A). 2. All the grounds of appeal are related to the deletion of addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'Act'). During the course of assessment proceedings, the AO found that the assessee received advances from M/s Lalith Mohan Spices Pvt. Ltd to the extent of Rs. 2,50,22,099/- and it was also observed that the assessee is a director having more than 20% of share in the company. The AO further found that the assessee was running his own business of trading in chilles and using the funds of the company for his own purpose. Therefore, the AO has asked the assessee to explain as to why the advances receiv....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....olding more than 20% of the share holding. The funds were used for his own business purposes and made the profit. The Ld.DR referred section 188 of the Companies Act which places restrictions on the related party transactions. The Ld.DR further argued that as per section 188 of the Act, the Director is not permitted to take any advances from the company or enter into contract / arrangement with related party. Therefore, argued that the assessee having fully known the provisions of the Companies Act, entered into the transaction against the Company Law. The Ld.DR further submitted that Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of P.Sarada Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Madras, 229 ITR 444 held that the advances made by the company to the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Spices Pvt. Ltd., therefore, viewed that the same required to be taxed u/s 2(22)(e) of the Act. We observe from the order of the AO that the assessee did not fail to furnish any information which was called for by the AO. The Ld.AR submitted the paper book and as per page No.21 of the paper book, the assessee furnished the account copy of Lalith Mohan Spices (P) Ltd., in the books of Lalith Kumar Bagrecha as per which the assessee has received the advances and out of the same purchased chillies from M/s Religare Commodities Ltd. through NCMSL and supplied the same to the company. We, observe from the account copy of M/s Lalith Mohan Spices Pvt. Ltd., placed in the paper book that the advances were received for purchase of chillies to make t....