Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (4) TMI 501

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or Respondent: Shri N.N. Prabhudesai, Supdtt. (A.R.) ORDER PER: DR.D.M. MISRA This appeal is filed against Order-in- Appeal No.VSK/49/ Th-I/2009, dt.16.12.2009, passed by the Commissioner of C & CE (Appeals), Mumbai. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the Appellants are engaged in manufacture of Aerated Water, Postmix canisters of brand Thums-Up, Coca-Cola, Sprite etc falling ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by the said order, they filed appeal before the learned Commissioner (Appeals), who in turn, rejected their appeal. Hence the present appeal. 3. The Appellant in their grounds of appeal has submitted that the samples were drawn by the Appellant for testing purposes and also to examine the future complaints relating to the said manufactured product. It is their contention that a major portion of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pport, he refers to the judgment of the Tribunal in the case of Positive Packaging Industries Ltd Vs CCE New Panvel - 2010 (249) ELT 57 (Tri-Mumbai) and the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of ITC Ltd case (supra). 5. Heard both sides and perused the records. The short question involved in the present appeal is whether the duty is required to be paid on the samples which were not rem....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... have not been controverted by the revenue. It is not the case of the revenue that the assessee has failed to maintain the books/accounts as required under the Rules relating to the samples drawn for testing. Where the goods are not cleared out of the factory premises but were drawn for testing within the factory and in fact were consumed within the factory during the process of testing, the quest....