2020 (4) TMI 498

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Chandigarh in CRA-S-1717-SBA of 2005 in and by which the High Court has set aside the Order of the First Appellate Court and restored the judgment of the Trial Court and thereby convicting the appellant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for six months and also imposing fine of Rs. 4,17,148/-. (3) The case of the respondent-complainant is that the appellant-accused purchased the pesticides on credit from the respondent-company and made part payments. Both the appellant and the respondent were maintaining the running accounts. In lieu of payment due and payable to the respondent, the appellant has issued a cheque on 30.04.1999 of Rs. 4,17,148/- drawn on State Bank of India at Ba....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....those grounds learned Additional Sessions Judge reversed the conviction and acquitted the appellant. (5) Being aggrieved, the respondent-complainant has filed revision before the High Court. By the impugned order, the High Court has set aside the judgment of learned Sessions Judge and allowed the appeal of the respondent. The High Court in the impugned judgment held that "the reason given by the lower Appellate Court that he did not bring the cash book or order book etc. could well be understood, if civil suit is tried" but on the contrary the order passed by the lower Appellate Court is in the criminal case filed under Section 138 of the N.I. Act. Insofar as the authorisation in favour of the respondent to file the complaint is concerne....