1973 (4) TMI 121

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tion of Clauses 3, 4 and 5 of the Bihar Essential Commodities Act-other than Food grains-Prices and Stocks (Display and Control) Order, 1967 (hereinafter called the order), pending in the Court of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Gaya. 2. According to the prosecution case, on receipt of confidential information that the proprietor of M/s. Auto Spare, Law Road, Gaya, was not properly maintaining the account of Motor Tyres, with the ulterior motive of withholding the supply of the said article to the genuine customers, Shri Ram Nivas Singh, Marketing Officer, Gaya, had, along with two supply Inspectors, made a surprise inspection of the firm on May 22, 1969 and found certain irregularities. One of those irregularities was, the failure of the f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....over the commodities like Motor Tyres and Motor Tubes though he himself thought that he would have taken a different view, had the matter been res Integra. Item No. 5 even according to the learned Single Judge's own view could not cover the Motor Tyres and Motor Tubes. Being, however, bound by the earlier decision, he held the prosecution of the proprietors of the firm to be misconceived. The prosecution was accordingly quashed. 4. In this Court, our attention has been drawn to item No. 1 in Schedule I of the Order. This item reads :- 1. Component parts and accessories of automobiles. It is contended that this item must cover 'Tyres and Tubes of Motor Cars and Motor Cycles'. According to the argument forcibly pressed on beha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of any category whatsoever'. The effect of the decision of the present case would, therefore, seem, prima facie, to be confined only to the fate of the prosecution initiated against the respondents. It has not been stated or even suggested at the Bar if any (and if so. how many) pending cases of similar nature are likely to be governed by the decision of this Court. Unfortunately, even the High Court has made a laconic order on oral request, merely stating : IT IS CERTIFIED That this case fulfils the requirement of Article 134(1)(c) of the Constitution of India and is fit for appeal to the Supreme Court. without showing on its face what substantial question of law or principle of great importance was involved justifying the grant o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....by the Ministry of Commerce, Government of India in which Types and Tubes of Scooters were expressly mentioned as essential commodities distinct from the component parts and accessories of automobiles. Reference in that judgment was also made to a Notification dated August 22, 1968 (No. S.Q. 2878) issued by the Central Government in which similarly Tyres and Tubes of Cars, etc. were specifically mentioned as essential commodities, and to a still later Notification by the Central Government dated January 3, 1969 (No. S.O. 85) in which Tyres and Tubes of Cars were mentioned in a manner almost similar to the one found in the Bihar Government Gazette Notification No. G.S.R. 82 dated September 18, 1970. 8. In this background even assuming that ....