2019 (5) TMI 1763

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... : Shri Amal Paresh Dave Advocate For the Respondent : Shri T.K.Sikdar, Assistant Commissioner (AR) ORDER RAJU This appeal has been filed by M/s. Sun Builders against confirmation of demand of service tax and imposition of penalty. 2. Ld. Counsel for the appellant pointed out that appellant had constructed residential and Commercial Shopping complex. During the period of constructio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t be taxed prior to 01.07.2010. He argued that the entire demand in the impugned order relates to period prior to 01.07.2010 and consequently, the demand and penalty should be set-aside. 3. Ld. AR relies on the impugned order. 4. We have considered the rival submissions. We find that the issue involved is identical to the issue involved in the case of Krishna Homes (supra). In the said decis....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....omplex and full payment having been made, are to be treated as works contracts, it has to be held that during the period of dispute, there was no intention of the Government to tax the activity in terms of such contracts a builder/developer with prospective customers for construction of residential units in a residential complex. Such works contracts involving transfer of immovable property were b....