Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1991 (7) TMI 44

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... S. SODHI J.-The matter here relates to exemption from additional wealth-tax for the assessment years 1970-71 to 1973-74. The controversy being whether, urban land where agricultural operations are carried on, falls within the definition of "business premises" in terms of rule 1(i), Paragraph B, Part I, of the Schedule to the Wealth-tax Act, 1957,and is thus entitled to exemption from additional w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....emises" as provided in rule l(i), Paragraph B, Part 1, of the Schedule to the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, and would thus be entitled to exemption from the charge of additional wealth-tax on urban assets, under Paragraph A(2). A similar view was expressed in CWT v. Devinder Kaur [1984] 146 ITR 234 (P & H). It may be pointed Out here that the special leave petition filed against this judgment was also ....