Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (3) TMI 1158

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Authorised Representative, for the Appellant Absent on call, for the Respondent ORDER PER: ANIL G. SHAKKARWAR Heard on Rectification of Mistake Application. Learned Authorised Representative appearing for revenue has submitted that the issue involved was in relation to refund of SAD under Notification No.102/2007-Cus dated 14.09.2007. He has submitted that the litigation policy did not cover....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....8.07.2010 both issued by CBEC. As per the Circular dated 28.04.2008, a certificate issued by the statutory auditor who certifies the annual accounts of the importer, that the burden of 4% SED has not been passed on by the importer to the buyer was sufficient for satisfying the principals of unjust-enrichment. Such requirement was fulfilled by the appellant and therefore the present ground are in v....