Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (1) TMI 1444

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....A)-4 Mumbai dt. 3.1.2013 pertaining to A.Y. 2009-10. As common issues are involved in both these appeals, they were heard together and dispose of by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. ITA No. 4904/M/2012 - A.Y. 2008-09 2. The assessee is trading in securities and also in the business of advisory service, finance leasing and investment in securities. The return for the year was selected for scrutiny assessment. During the course of the scrutiny assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee has earned dividend income of Rs. 16,92,522/- and long term capital gain of Rs. 85,74,072/-, both were claimed as exempt u/s. 10(34) and 10(38) of the Act respectively. The AO observed that the assess....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f Sec. 14A of the Act, we set aside the findings of the Ld. CIT(A) and direct the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 2,60,839/-. Ground No. 1 is accordingly allowed. 8. Ground No. 2(a) and 2(b) are consequential to our finding to ground No.1, therefore, ground No. 2(a) and 2(b) are treated as allowed in view of our findings given for ground No. 1. 9. Ground No. 3 relates to the addition of Rs. 2,03,107/- being securities transaction tax to the book profit computed u/s. 115JB. 10. A perusal of the assessment order shows that the addition has been made as per the explanation 1(f) of Sec. 115 JB of the Act. The said provision shows that it refers the amount of expenditure relatable to any income to which Sec. 10 other than the provision....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....epare its accounts in the manner provided in part-II and Part-III of Schedule-VI to the Companies Act 1956. Since the assessee's profit and loss account is not prepared in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, the notional profit shown by the assessee has to be reduced while computing the book profit u/s. 115JB of the Act. Similar view has been taken by the Tribunal in the case of M/s. Bombay Diamond Co. Ltd in ITA No. 7488/M/07 wherein the Tribunal has held as under: "The various other decisions relied on by the Ld. CIT(A) in his order are also not applicable. In none of the case it has been held that even where the accounts are not prepared in the manner provided as per Part II and Part III of Schedule VI ....