Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (3) TMI 390

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....siness of trading in bullions and all types of gold and diamond jewellery under the name and style of M/s. Sai Jewels. For the assessment year 2012-13, assessee had filed its return of income on 13.06.2012 declaring total income of Rs. 4,87,370/-. Assessment u/s. 143(3) was, however, complete at an income of Rs. 64,53,540/- making certain additions including addition of Rs. 45 lacs on account of sundry creditors. 3. Aggrieved by such addition, the assessee preferred appeal before the ld. CIT(A) and by way of the impugned order, ld. CIT(A) deleted other additions but confirmed the addition of Rs. 40 lacs out of Rs. 45 lacs added by the Assessing Officer u/s. 28 read with section 41 of the Income-tax Act ("the Act"). 4. The assessee is,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... he contended that in view of the decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of CIT vs. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd., 404 ITR 1 (SC), section 28 of the Act has no application since the alleged benefit of the assessee is not in the nature of cash or money and section 41(1) has also no application since there was no cessation of any trading liability. 6. Per contra, it is the submission on behalf of the Revenue that the assessee did not produce any purchase voucher before the Assessing Officer to substantiate his claim and further that there was no rebuttal of the observation of the Assessing Officer that the rates on which the assessee had shown to have purchased the gold from his father on 01.03.2012, 03.03.2012 and 17.03.2012 also vary as t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....see is engaged in the business of Trading in bullions and all types of gold and diamond jewellery under the name and style of M/s. Sai Jewels. During the year under consideration, the assessee has declared Gross Turnover at Rs. 71,34,82,470/- and Gross Profit of Rs. 22,04,057/- yielding G.P. rate of 0.22%. After debiting expenses in P&L account, the Net Profit of Rs. 4,93,828/- has been declared. The details furnished with respect to trading results supported with bills and vouches were examined and placed on record." 9. The entire question in this matter revolves around whether the liability of the assessee towards the gold of his father introduced into the business of assessee ceased to exist or not. According to assessee, he alone is ....