Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1992 (2) TMI 44

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and Wealth Ordinance, 1975, onus lay on the Department to prove that there was concealment of income ? (3) Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the assessee could be said to have discharged the onus which lay on it under the Explanation to section 271(1)(c)?" Briefly stated, the facts are that, in respect of the said assessment years, the assessments were completed by the Income-tax Officer. Subsequently, a raid was conducted on the premises of the assessee under section 132(1) of the Income-tax Act and certain documents were seized. Before any further proceedings could be taken pursuant to the said raid, the Voluntary Disclosure Act of 1976 was promulgated. Taking advantage of this Act, the assessee filed disclosure under....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....imposition of the said penalties. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) cancelled the imposition of penalties. The Department then filed a second appeal to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal but, by a common order dated October 10, 1980, the said appeals were dismissed. It is thereafter that the aforesaid questions of law were referred to this court. It has been contended by learned counsel for the Department that the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal decided in favour of the assessee on the ground that the Department had not discharged the onus of proof. It may here be noticed that, in respect of the assessment years in question, the Tribunal had followed its earlier orders in respect of the assessment years 1968-69 to 1970-71 and 1972-73, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sum which shall not be less than 20 per cent. but which shall not exceed one and a half times the amount of the tax, if any, which would have been avoided if the income as returned by such person had been accepted as the correct income. Explanation. -Where the total income returned by any person is less than 80 per cent. of the total income (hereinafter in this Explanation referred to as the correct income) as assessed under section 143 or section 144 or section 147 (reduced by the expenditure incurred bona fide by him for the purpose of making or earning any income included in the total income but which has been disallowed as a deduction), such person shall, unless he proves that the failure to return the correct income did not arise from....