Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (2) TMI 702

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aran for Respondents.   P.C.:- These two Appeals arise from the same set of facts and have been disposed of by common order by the Customs, Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai dated 13 March 2019. 2. By the impugned order the Tribunal had reduced the penalty imposed on the Respondents-Directors of a Company from Rs. 10,00,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Crores Only) to Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupee....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ria Industries Limited was issued certain Advance Licenses by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade. The bonds were executed in respect of these Licenses. Parasrampuria Industries Limited was allowed imports under the Advanced Licenses. According to the Appellant, Parasrampuria Industries Limited (the Company) had undertaken to fulfill the Export Obligations and the Company failed to submit the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd perverse, while it is the contention of the Respondents that considering the background facts, the order is correct and should not be interfered with. It is contended by the Respondents that the reasons are given in the order about the abatement of Appeals against the Company and one of the Directors. 6. That the Tribunal would have discretion to fix the quantum of penalty can not be disputed,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... question of law as reframed will have to be answered in favour of the Appellant. 7. Accordingly the Appeals are allowed. The impugned order dated 13 March 2019 to the extent it reduces the penalty from Rupees Ten Crores to Rupees One Lakh is quashed and set aside. 8. The Appeals No.C/919 and 921/2009 stand restored to the file of the Tribunal, only on the aspect of fixation of the quantum of pe....