2020 (2) TMI 471

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....19 - -<br>Indian Laws<br>Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravindra Kumar Sinha No. 2, Advocate For the State : Mr. Amit Bhushan, AC to GP 17 ORAL JUDGMENT Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Both the cases have been taken up together for the purpose of disposal as the parties are common and the issue is also common. 3. The petitioners of CWJC No. 23869 of 201....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the State submitted that till date, they have not paid any amount to any person due to the pending controversy between them. 6. On earlier occasion, the Court had given time to learned counsel for the respective parties to come up with a compromise formula, in accordance with law. 7. Today, the stand is that in terms of the provisions for payment of family pension, the petitioners of CWJC N....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... In effect, the petitioners of CWJC No. 23869 of 2019 would be given 2/6 = 1/3rd of the total dues of the deceased employee whereas the petitioner of CWJC No. 24504 of 2019, who is the second wife would be given 4/6= 2/3 of the said dues for herself and her three children. 9. Learned counsel for the State readily agreed to the formula which does not violate any legal provision. 10. Having regar....