2020 (2) TMI 271

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he writ petitions being the same, those have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. 3. However, for the sake of convenience, relevant facts may be noted from Writ Petition No. 2471 of 2019. 4. This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India assailing the legality and correctness of order dated 13.3.2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, "A" Bench, Mumbai ("Tribunal" for short) in M.A. No. 658/M/2018 arising out of Income Tax Appeal No. 4875/Mum/2014 for the assessment year 1999- 2000. 4.1. From a perusal of the order dated 13.3.2019, it is seen that petitioner had challenged the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) restricting its profit to the extent ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... justice. 2. He ought to have restricted the estimation upto 1% proposed by the Assessing Officer in similar circumstances in group company's appeal being ITA No. 4876/Mum/2014, in his letter / SCN dated 20.7.2007.   3. The CIT(A) is further not justified in reducing the addition / estimation to 1.5% from 3% on sales and purchases. He ought to have restricted 1% on sale or purchase either, not on both. 4. The CIT(A) is not justified in confirming the rejection of audited book results without going into the background facts and compelling circumstances to save other's skin in the proceedings before the Settlement Commission." 4.3. The related appeal was heard by the Tribunal on 29.5.2018 and by orde....