Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2020 (1) TMI 698

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....order dated 12 August 2016 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in Income Tax Appeal No.7660/M/2014. 3. The Appeal pertains to the Assessment Year 2010-2011. 4. The Appellant - Revenue has framed the following questions as a substantial questions of law :- "(A) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Hon'ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal erred in deleting the addit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... facts and circumstances which was upheld by Hon'ble Bombay High Court order dated 20/3/2014 in Income Tax Appeal No. 14 of 2012 ?" 5. The Respondent - Assessee had sold six units from a commercial complex. An addition of Rs. 4.16 crore was made to the income of assessee. Assessee firm is builder and developer and engaged in the activity of buildings and redevelopment of real estate projects. Ass....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of assessee that sale price of Unit No. 302 was higher than the stamp duty is not relevant. Assessing Officer also rejected the submission of assessee that Unit No. 302 suffers from design disadvantages and it could not get any customers to purchase the premises of Unit No. 302. The Assessing Officer held that the prevailing rates were in the range of Rs. 2,38,576/- to Rs. 2,94,485/- per sq.mtr. a....